river-wear
Well-known member
Hi, I'm another newbie here. I was diagnosed with AR when I was four. It's a congenital defect, so my mom says it was the first time I didn't scream & cry at the doctor that they could hear the murmur. Pretty much through my childhood I was told that I'd need the valve replaced, probably "when I hit puberty."
Well, I made it to 42. Unfortunately I left my trusted and much-appreciated cardiologist back in Michigan eight years ago. I had a new one here in CA for a few years before getting fed up and switching last year. On my second visit to the new doctor, she tells me my left ventrical has increased in size (volume?) from 5.7 to 6.4 and I should have this thing fixed within the year. Hooray, I have time to research and plan. (And take my 73-year-old mom on a trip in June first.)
Do I get a second opinion now? I'm thinking I should change cardiologists anyway because the current one was chosen more for convenience to home rather than based on hospital privileges. I think Stanford or Sequoia are probably the best choices in my area - they're both about 30 miles from me, so not bad. Should everything get into planning mode now? My current cardiologist scheduled me to return in July 2010 and didn't mention any specific surgeon yet.
I don't think I'll even be ready to choose the hospital until I figure out what surgical approach to take (straight replacement vs. Ross procedure). Is it very expensive to consult with more than one surgeon for treatment options? Is it "normal" to meet with more than one?
Well, I made it to 42. Unfortunately I left my trusted and much-appreciated cardiologist back in Michigan eight years ago. I had a new one here in CA for a few years before getting fed up and switching last year. On my second visit to the new doctor, she tells me my left ventrical has increased in size (volume?) from 5.7 to 6.4 and I should have this thing fixed within the year. Hooray, I have time to research and plan. (And take my 73-year-old mom on a trip in June first.)
Do I get a second opinion now? I'm thinking I should change cardiologists anyway because the current one was chosen more for convenience to home rather than based on hospital privileges. I think Stanford or Sequoia are probably the best choices in my area - they're both about 30 miles from me, so not bad. Should everything get into planning mode now? My current cardiologist scheduled me to return in July 2010 and didn't mention any specific surgeon yet.
I don't think I'll even be ready to choose the hospital until I figure out what surgical approach to take (straight replacement vs. Ross procedure). Is it very expensive to consult with more than one surgeon for treatment options? Is it "normal" to meet with more than one?