Nocturne
Well-known member
This has been bugging me a bit this week...
Shortly after I learned about my "very mild aortic stenosis", I had a coronary CT scan done that casually mentioned "very mild" calcification of the aortic valve. I asked the techs to ran my second echo whether or not they could tell if I had a bicuspid aortic valve or a regular tricuspid one, and they said it looked tricuspid (but it seemed to me that they weren't terribly confident -- ie one asked the other what they thought, and the other looked pensive before giving an answer).
Assuming I DO have a regular tricuspid aortic valve -- how the heck is "very mild" calcification of the aortic valve causing AS? Is that normal? I thought there were a lot of people with significant aortic valve calcification and NO AS at all. Why is a small amount causing recognizable AS?
Shortly after I learned about my "very mild aortic stenosis", I had a coronary CT scan done that casually mentioned "very mild" calcification of the aortic valve. I asked the techs to ran my second echo whether or not they could tell if I had a bicuspid aortic valve or a regular tricuspid one, and they said it looked tricuspid (but it seemed to me that they weren't terribly confident -- ie one asked the other what they thought, and the other looked pensive before giving an answer).
Assuming I DO have a regular tricuspid aortic valve -- how the heck is "very mild" calcification of the aortic valve causing AS? Is that normal? I thought there were a lot of people with significant aortic valve calcification and NO AS at all. Why is a small amount causing recognizable AS?