L
LaniBug
Hi. I'm new to this board. You all seem like a very supportive group with much information.
My father-in-law had a bicuspid aortic valve replaced 13 days ago. Prior to surgery my husband and I went with him to meet the surgeon, and discuss the entire procedure. Because he has been on coumadin for the past 15 years already, the surgeon told us a mechanical valve was definitely the right choice. (Dad is 70, but in pretty good health. Had a problem with blood clots many years ago, hence the need for coumadin. His only complaint recently has been some shortness of breath.) The surgeon said the mechanical valve would last longer than the tissue that would need replacing in 10 or so years. We all agreed, and surgery was set.
Two days after surgery, mom was handed a card that needs to be kept in Dad's wallet that says he received a tissue valve. Mom said, "it must be a mistake...he was supposed to get a mechanical valve." After the nurse checked with the surgeon, the surgeon said that he used a tissue valve because the mechanical valve wouldn't have fit properly.
Have any of you ever heard of this? Sounds to me like each person here chose the type of valve they received.
Now dad is 13 days post op, and really struggling. He was doing rehab on Friday, when he started running a fever. He has been placed back on the ventilator, and tests have shown an infection in both lungs, AND a test yesterday showed an infection on the new valve. The surgeon says that he is not strong enough to survive another surgery. They have placed him on Zyvox, (a strong antibiotic), but the surgeon does not sound too positive about being able to fight the infection.
Do any of you know anything about either of these problems.
I appreciate your time and prayers for dad, (Grady).
Thanks,
Lani
My father-in-law had a bicuspid aortic valve replaced 13 days ago. Prior to surgery my husband and I went with him to meet the surgeon, and discuss the entire procedure. Because he has been on coumadin for the past 15 years already, the surgeon told us a mechanical valve was definitely the right choice. (Dad is 70, but in pretty good health. Had a problem with blood clots many years ago, hence the need for coumadin. His only complaint recently has been some shortness of breath.) The surgeon said the mechanical valve would last longer than the tissue that would need replacing in 10 or so years. We all agreed, and surgery was set.
Two days after surgery, mom was handed a card that needs to be kept in Dad's wallet that says he received a tissue valve. Mom said, "it must be a mistake...he was supposed to get a mechanical valve." After the nurse checked with the surgeon, the surgeon said that he used a tissue valve because the mechanical valve wouldn't have fit properly.
Have any of you ever heard of this? Sounds to me like each person here chose the type of valve they received.
Now dad is 13 days post op, and really struggling. He was doing rehab on Friday, when he started running a fever. He has been placed back on the ventilator, and tests have shown an infection in both lungs, AND a test yesterday showed an infection on the new valve. The surgeon says that he is not strong enough to survive another surgery. They have placed him on Zyvox, (a strong antibiotic), but the surgeon does not sound too positive about being able to fight the infection.
Do any of you know anything about either of these problems.
I appreciate your time and prayers for dad, (Grady).
Thanks,
Lani