HiMyNameIsDale
Member
I am scheduled for surgery at Cleveland Clinic on March 27th and I am finding it hard to make a valve choice. I have a bicuspid aortic valve with severe regurgitation and mild stenosis with symptoms due to the regurgitation. I also have a ascending aortic aneurysm at 48mm. The repair of my valve or the mechanical valves with tissue seem like a bad choice because of my youth and the rapid failure rate. I also don't want to have another surgery in five or six years if I can avoid it. The mechanical valve seems to give me the best option due to the potential to last a long time, but the mechanical valve involves coumadin that I will be taking for the rest of my life. Are there any serious problems noticed with taking coumadin? Basically, I need to know if it is better to just take coumadin and potentially avoid another surgery in the near future or get the tissue valves and stay off of coumadin for around 5 to 7 years and then have another surgery. The cardiologists suggest to keep me off of coumadin for as long as possible? Is coumadin really that big of a problem or a problem that is worth avoiding for 5 or 6 or 7 years? Have tissue valves ever lasted 10 to 15 years in young people? I have no idea what to do because I am young and this choice will have a lasting impact on my life whether it is good or bad. Yet, any surgery will be a better choice than none.