USA Today article: Gene test cuts complications from blood thinner warfarin

Valve Replacement Forums

Help Support Valve Replacement Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

drivetopless

VR.org Supporter
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2008
Messages
650
Location
formerly Atlanta, GA.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2010-03-16-warfarin-gene_N.htm

March 15, 2010: By Steve Sternberg, USA TODAY
ATLANTA — Doctors who used a genetic test to personalize treatment with warfarin, the world's most widely prescribed blood thinner, cut their patients' hospitalization rates by almost a third, researchers said Tuesday.
The study marks the first nationwide attempt to incorporate genetic testing into the routine use of a drug whose effects vary so much from one person to another that it carries a "black box" warning, the government's most urgent safety alert.


DRUG LABELS: Some note effect of inherited genes
GENETIC TESTING: May soon yield personalized health treatments

Roughly one in five patients are hospitalized for bleeding within six months of starting the drug. Others develop life-threatening blood clots. Doctors must monitor their patients regularly; it may take weeks for them to settle on a safe and effective dose.

"Warfarin is the second-greatest cause of hospitalizations due to drug complications in the country," says Eric Topol, director of the Scripps Translational Science Institute in La Jolla, Calif., who wasn't involved in the study.

Testing was so beneficial that it surprised lead author Robert Epstein, chief medical officer for Medco Health Solutions.

"We were hoping to find a 20% difference," Epstein says. "When we saw it was 30%, we nearly fell off our chairs."

Despite its risks, warfarin, sold as Coumadin and Jantoven, is a mainstay of heart treatment. It's prescribed to 2 million new patients in the USA each year to guard against strokes, second heart attacks and blood clots.

The new findings are the result of a unique partnership between Medco, which administers drug benefits for 65 million beneficiaries, and the Mayo Clinic.

The study involved 896 patients who were tested early for their sensitivity to warfarin, which is governed by two genes. An additional 2,688 patients who weren't tested served as controls. Those who were tested were 31% less likely to land in a hospital bed for any cause and 28% less likely to be hospitalized for bleeding or a clot, Epstein reported at a meeting here of the American College of Cardiology.

Medco and the health plans it serves also will benefit from testing, he says, because safer alternatives to warfarin now being developed are likely to be much more expensive.

Topol and the authors note that the research has drawbacks because of its small size and research design. As a result, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute is sponsoring a much more rigorous trial, led by Stephen Kimmel of the University of Pennsylvania. "We hope to have results within two years," Kimmel says.
 
There is only one problem with this, most insurances will not cover the test and it's semi expensive, but bottom line is, it doesn't correct the mismanagement that these doctors continue to do. If we can figure it out, why can't they?

Better and cheaper suggestion to our professionals, allow home testing, pay for once a week testing, allow self dosing, stop pretending you know it all. That will be much cheaper and even better statistics. Also, stop calling it a blood thinner. Call it what it is, an anticoagulant. We are not stupid people and you don't have to talk dumbed down to us.
 
1 - Based on the first part of the article I am sure that we will all be dead in the morning; face down in a very thin pool of red goo that leaked from every pore of our bodies.
2 - Medco sucks. I have to use them because of my work policy. And, that is all I will say about that. Even though I don't like the way things are done, I need the benefit.
3 - I am sure the gene tests will show how a particular individual reacts with vitamin K, grapefruit juice, cranberry juice, etc... and how that interacts with the warfarin.
 
It is salient that the most hospitalizations occur in the first five months. This is when the doctors/clinics are most intimately involved with initially stabilizing the patient's anticoagulation therapy. Seems that the capabilities and knowledge of various different clinics and docters is uneven. I believe that using appropriate techniques, such as Al Lodwick's and others discussed here, along with self-testing, would reduce that rate as well. Clinics seem to like to overrespond to out-of-range readings.

However, that's in a perfect world. As such, this can help in the meantime. Hopefully, surgeons will begin to prescribe the test as a part of choosing and installing the valve, which will take it out of the patient's hands. Also, since there's now a proven overall savings involved, savvy insurers are likely to allow it. Those already settled into their coumadin probably don't represent significant savings for the insurnace companies, so it may take time or special individual circumstances to get the test for them.

Best wishes,
 
I have to remind myself that the lions share of Coumadin patients aren't capable of managing their own care. Not sure I buy that, but that's what my Cardio was saying. He said some are to aged, senile, alzheimers patients, etc. It still doesn't settle the issue that most Doctors don't know a thing about proper dosing.
 
Back
Top