Hello all. I am trying to do some research for my 50 year old dad who is about to have his aortic valve replaced in a couple weeks. He has a bicuspid aortic valve with stenosis but didnt find out about it until his 30's. He does not have a spleen and has to be careful of infection or illness but is very healthy otherwise. Per the cardiologist that did his heart cath, his arteries are "crystal clear". He has the choice of a tissue or mechanical valve. His hobbies include riding the motorcycle, volunteer firefighting, mechanical work, hunting, fishing, etc, which are pretty important to him. I think he is leaning more towards a tissue valve since there would be less doctor visits, no Coumadin, not having to be careful of what he eats, etc. He has mentioned to me in the past that he doesnt like the thought of having to take medicine everyday (being dependent on the Coumadin- with mechanical valve). I personally feel that tissue valve is the way to go because of his age and health, but the decision is ultimately his. Also at the most recent visit with the surgeon, he was told it is very common to have to have a pacemaker put in after the replacement. I am hoping to find people on here that have both done and what do you feel are the pros and cons of having either done. Also if any of you had to have a pacemaker. Any help/info is greatly appreciated.
Dana
Dana