This was on Yahoo today, word is getting around...

Valve Replacement Forums

Help Support Valve Replacement Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Y

Yaps

Study Suggests Earlier Valve Leak Surgery

7 minutes ago Health - AP


By STEPHANIE NANO, Associated Press Writer

People with severely leaky heart valves that cause no symptoms ? a situation thought to be relatively harmless ? actually are in danger of dying and should consider surgery to get the problem fixed right away, a new study suggests.

Yahoo! Health
Have questions about your health?
Find answers here.






Such people are five times more likely to die of a heart problem or develop heart failure or an irregular heartbeat than those with mild leakage, researchers at the Mayo Clinic reported in Thursday's New England Journal of Medicine (news - web sites).


Their study involved the mitral valve, which connects the upper left chamber with the heart's main pumping chamber. If the valve's two flaps don't close tightly, blood can leak back into the upper chamber when the heart contracts.


Most people don't feel anything, but if it gets gets worse, they can develop shortness of breath, fatigue, dizziness and palpitations.


Doctors can detect the condition by listening to the heart, but usually don't recommend surgery to repair or replace the valve unless it causes symptoms or damages the heart itself.


The Mayo researchers used a relatively new ultrasound technique to take measurements of the hearts of 456 patients who had leaky valves but no symptoms and found that the size of the hole in the valve was the strongest predictor of how the patient would fare. Without surgery, those with bigger holes ? about the width of a pencil ? did the worst.


"When it's severe, it's fixable. And we can determine when it's severe now with new techniques," said Dr. Maurice Enriquez-Sarano, who led the study.


Of the estimated 2.7 million Americans with notable leakage, about 600,000 are probably candidates for early surgery, Sarano said.


Study participants were enrolled between 1991 and 2000. All had leaky heart valves without symptoms and no other heart problems. Their disorder was classified mild, moderate or severe based on the volume of their leakage and the size of the valve hole.


Participants were monitored and treated independently by their own physicians, and updated information on the patients was collected by the researchers in 2002.


Their findings showed age, diabetes and the valve hole were strong predictors of survival.


Eventually, 232 had heart surgery, all but two for valve repair or replacement. The researchers said surgery reduced the patients' risk of heart failure and death and their life expectancy returned to normal.


Dr. Catherine Otto of the University of Washington in Seattle, said the study is a big step forward because physicians can use the measurement to tell patients what to expect if they have a valve problem. But she said the measurements are challenging to make, and the data apply only to those without any other heart problem.


"I don't want every patient to rush off and demand surgery tomorrow," said Otto, co-author of an accompanying editorial in the journal. "Some people will go to surgery earlier if their surgery risk is low and their valve is repairable."


The editorial writers and Sarano said the next step is a randomized study in severe cases that compares early surgery with surgery done when symptoms appear.


___
 
Yaps said:
Study Suggests Earlier Valve Leak Surgery

7 minutes ago Health - AP


By STEPHANIE NANO, Associated Press Writer

People with severely leaky heart valves that cause no symptoms ? a situation thought to be relatively harmless ? actually are in danger of dying and should consider surgery to get the problem fixed right away, a new study suggests.

Yahoo! Health
Have questions about your health?
Find answers here.






Such people are five times more likely to die of a heart problem or develop heart failure or an irregular heartbeat than those with mild leakage, researchers at the Mayo Clinic reported in Thursday's New England Journal of Medicine (news - web sites).


Their study involved the mitral valve, which connects the upper left chamber with the heart's main pumping chamber. If the valve's two flaps don't close tightly, blood can leak back into the upper chamber when the heart contracts.


Most people don't feel anything, but if it gets gets worse, they can develop shortness of breath, fatigue, dizziness and palpitations.


Doctors can detect the condition by listening to the heart, but usually don't recommend surgery to repair or replace the valve unless it causes symptoms or damages the heart itself.


The Mayo researchers used a relatively new ultrasound technique to take measurements of the hearts of 456 patients who had leaky valves but no symptoms and found that the size of the hole in the valve was the strongest predictor of how the patient would fare. Without surgery, those with bigger holes ? about the width of a pencil ? did the worst.


"When it's severe, it's fixable. And we can determine when it's severe now with new techniques," said Dr. Maurice Enriquez-Sarano, who led the study.


Of the estimated 2.7 million Americans with notable leakage, about 600,000 are probably candidates for early surgery, Sarano said.


Study participants were enrolled between 1991 and 2000. All had leaky heart valves without symptoms and no other heart problems. Their disorder was classified mild, moderate or severe based on the volume of their leakage and the size of the valve hole.


Participants were monitored and treated independently by their own physicians, and updated information on the patients was collected by the researchers in 2002.


Their findings showed age, diabetes and the valve hole were strong predictors of survival.


Eventually, 232 had heart surgery, all but two for valve repair or replacement. The researchers said surgery reduced the patients' risk of heart failure and death and their life expectancy returned to normal.


Dr. Catherine Otto of the University of Washington in Seattle, said the study is a big step forward because physicians can use the measurement to tell patients what to expect if they have a valve problem. But she said the measurements are challenging to make, and the data apply only to those without any other heart problem.


"I don't want every patient to rush off and demand surgery tomorrow," said Otto, co-author of an accompanying editorial in the journal. "Some people will go to surgery earlier if their surgery risk is low and their valve is repairable."


The editorial writers and Sarano said the next step is a randomized study in severe cases that compares early surgery with surgery done when symptoms appear.


___

Thank you so much for the info! I have mitral valve prolapse and bicuspid aortic valve and all the information I can get that may help me with decision making later is greatly valued. Thanks again. Wise
 
I read this article and saw a story on the local NBC station here in NYC yesterday. It is very interesting and changes the thinking for those with Asymptomatic Severe Mitral Regurgitation (like me!). I encourage anyone in my shoes to read it.
 
In case anyone wants it, the researcher's e-mail is: [email protected]

I e-mailed my thanks to him for doing the research and publishing it -- got a response back within 90 minutes! He seemed quite pleased I e-mailed him. I told him the results of his research had been posted here...
 
Yep, he responded to me very quickly too. I was very impressed. Now I have to go get another echo where they can measure my "efficient regurgitant orifice", which according to the study, is the new key for determaining whether early surgery is a good idea in an asympomatic pateint with severe MR like myself.
 
I just thought it

I just thought it

was a very informative article , one that could help many...love the pup :eek:
 
barry70 said:
I meant "effective regurgitant orifice"
censored2.gif
Hmm somehow that sounds dirty. :D
 
OK, it said 232 eventually had surgery but I can't find the number of people they studied. Am I missing it?
 
It said

It said

456 patients;The Mayo researchers used a relatively new ultrasound technique to take measurements of the hearts of 456 patients ...
 
Ya beat me to it -- posting the article that is... My brother forwarded it to me at work today. Quite interesting, isn't it?
 
NEJM Article

NEJM Article

Sherry said:
Ya beat me to it -- posting the article that is... My brother forwarded it to me at work today. Quite interesting, isn't it?

Has anybody had a chance to look at the actual article? I wonder what actual valve area they're talking about?
 
I paid $10 to read the article on the NEJM web site. An effective regurgitent orifice of over 40 mm2 is the magic number.
 
...or they could have learned it by reading it here. We knew. :rolleyes:

Now, which one of those knuckle-draggers is is sitting on the mirror study they should be doing on aortic valves?

Duh!
 
2nd post on the same subject. Moving to the main thread.

Hey, its' the talk of the town today!
 
Back
Top