A
Andyrdj
Folks, would appreciate some input from both doctors and people who have had surgery using newer techniques.
I'm 31, have a bicuspid Aortic Valve, have had an operation in the past where they weren't sure at the time whether to replace or widen the valve, they went with widending.
Am I glad they did - I've had 14 years out of this so far and predicted around 5 years until it will need to be replaced. A split bicuspid valve still doesn't perform as well as a fully functional one, but during all my 20s I was able to enjoy a medication free existence and let loose as much as the next man.
So, I'm left looking at the options for in 5 years time, and one thing I'm 100% sure of is that I'm not having a mechanical valve. No way . It's a very personal decision, but the complications of having to thin my blood
daily, rely on medication, and being careful (how I loathe that word!) mean it just isn't for me.
I know plenty of you live full lives with mechanical valves, and enjoy the odd drink or so, but I'm the sort who likes a good party, to go for it and enjoy an all nighter. Not every often, just now and then.
I'm also very clumsy by nature and tend to bump into things and/or cut myself extremely regularly, but that's ok because I'm very rugged and heal easily.
So here you have me - someone used to living life to the full, and for whom a careful existence would be maddening. To the point where I'm taking a "rescue me or bury me" attitude to future surgery.
My doctor is aware of my preference, and has been willing to talk over alternatives. I would like to know of anyone with experience or information to offer on these options.
These include:
- next generation porcine/bovine bioprosthesis: I've been fairly impressed with the 20 year follow up on the Hancock 2, and I believe there has been 8+ years very impressive follow up on the Mosaic from Medtronic. Might be optimistic, but might be reasonable to expect 15 years from one of these.
- Ross procedure. Potentially very long term unless there is calcification of the pulmonary replacement, which is a pig to re-operate! But I have seen trials done using tissue cultured replacement pulmonary valves which shouldn't have this problem - I believe that there is around 5 years follow up at present?
- Percutaneous valve replacement. Designed to sit over the existing valve, and potentially be replaced on multiple occasions. Early stages yet. Would like to know if anyone has considered how to remove traditionally implanted valves and replace them, all using the percutaneous method?
I'm the sort of person who would volunteer for something more risky in order to gain more. Sure, life is precious, but only if you personally feel it's living. I'm not gung ho about this, I do intend to research these ideas thoroughly. And I'm willing to undergo multiple further operations if I have to - "better a day as a lion than a lifetime as a lamb".
To the point where I would sign a "do not resuccitate" order if my doctor was in mid operation and found he had no option but to install a mechanical valve.
So anyone with information of the above methods, or information on how I might enrol myself in trials for something new and promising I haven't thought oif, please let me know.
I should stress that I am not trying to put others off having a mechanical valve - I know some people are ok with it. As I said, it's a very personal thing - either offer me a life I'm willing to lead, or offer me nothing at all.
I'm 31, have a bicuspid Aortic Valve, have had an operation in the past where they weren't sure at the time whether to replace or widen the valve, they went with widending.
Am I glad they did - I've had 14 years out of this so far and predicted around 5 years until it will need to be replaced. A split bicuspid valve still doesn't perform as well as a fully functional one, but during all my 20s I was able to enjoy a medication free existence and let loose as much as the next man.
So, I'm left looking at the options for in 5 years time, and one thing I'm 100% sure of is that I'm not having a mechanical valve. No way . It's a very personal decision, but the complications of having to thin my blood
daily, rely on medication, and being careful (how I loathe that word!) mean it just isn't for me.
I know plenty of you live full lives with mechanical valves, and enjoy the odd drink or so, but I'm the sort who likes a good party, to go for it and enjoy an all nighter. Not every often, just now and then.
I'm also very clumsy by nature and tend to bump into things and/or cut myself extremely regularly, but that's ok because I'm very rugged and heal easily.
So here you have me - someone used to living life to the full, and for whom a careful existence would be maddening. To the point where I'm taking a "rescue me or bury me" attitude to future surgery.
My doctor is aware of my preference, and has been willing to talk over alternatives. I would like to know of anyone with experience or information to offer on these options.
These include:
- next generation porcine/bovine bioprosthesis: I've been fairly impressed with the 20 year follow up on the Hancock 2, and I believe there has been 8+ years very impressive follow up on the Mosaic from Medtronic. Might be optimistic, but might be reasonable to expect 15 years from one of these.
- Ross procedure. Potentially very long term unless there is calcification of the pulmonary replacement, which is a pig to re-operate! But I have seen trials done using tissue cultured replacement pulmonary valves which shouldn't have this problem - I believe that there is around 5 years follow up at present?
- Percutaneous valve replacement. Designed to sit over the existing valve, and potentially be replaced on multiple occasions. Early stages yet. Would like to know if anyone has considered how to remove traditionally implanted valves and replace them, all using the percutaneous method?
I'm the sort of person who would volunteer for something more risky in order to gain more. Sure, life is precious, but only if you personally feel it's living. I'm not gung ho about this, I do intend to research these ideas thoroughly. And I'm willing to undergo multiple further operations if I have to - "better a day as a lion than a lifetime as a lamb".
To the point where I would sign a "do not resuccitate" order if my doctor was in mid operation and found he had no option but to install a mechanical valve.
So anyone with information of the above methods, or information on how I might enrol myself in trials for something new and promising I haven't thought oif, please let me know.
I should stress that I am not trying to put others off having a mechanical valve - I know some people are ok with it. As I said, it's a very personal thing - either offer me a life I'm willing to lead, or offer me nothing at all.