coryp
Well-known member
Hello ALL,
I have taken your advice and seen Dr Raissi today (taked to Arlyss 2 days ago, she is great). I liked everything I heard from him. Here it the forecast, please chime in with your comments and thoughts I would really appreciate it;
1) I will have the entire Ascending Aorta removed
2) I will have to have a hemiarch (under circulatory arrest)
3) I will have the root remodeled (but the coronaries will remain in tact) no button
4) We will go with a EDWARDS BOVINE valve
Let's go over this a little. As per Rachel's last post the entire Ascending must be removed, mood point next, Apparently in Dr RAISSI's experience to make certain that the Aneursym does not re-occur a Hemi-arch MUST BE DONE (clamping the Aortic ARCH is not acceptable at 1-2 inches because the potential for Aneurysm is great). I like the idea of having the ROOT remodeled and not having to reimplant the coronaries (any idea if this is better), sounds better to me.
The last part is the valve selection, I was hoping to go with a Tissue but from what I have read 7-12 years would be the max it would last esp at my age. But I was as you may have read concerned about taking the Coumadin and the other issues regarding the mechanical, well he made it real simple, he suggested that BICUSPIDS (like me) usually with tissue disorder (like me, now I understand thank you Bob) do not do very well on Coumadin long term for many reasons. Also my blood type is 0- and very thin (he said that is also quite common is Bicuspids. We discussed the Porcein vs Bovine and he almost uses Bovine Edwards exclusively, sighting that 96% of patients will get 20 years out of this valve (exactly what I wanted to hear). Actually I went in thinking that if I could get him the committ to 15 years it may very well be worth going with the tissue vs the mechanical for just a few years difference and freedom from the changes. He gave me more than that I feel that if I am able to last 15-20 with this valve then I will be about 55 when I need the next (and hopefully final) valve replacement and at that time he said most should be done by cath, so the real fear of having to do another OPS is greatly reduced.
A few others on this site have voiced similar points and one individual from Texas (sorry I forgot your logon, but I will find it and post you directly) is about to make the same decision.
Please respond with your feedback to this post with thoughts and opinions. I have not finalized officially but we are looking at a surgical date of the 6/7. I feel pretty good now, first time since starting with the surgeons.
Thank you
I have taken your advice and seen Dr Raissi today (taked to Arlyss 2 days ago, she is great). I liked everything I heard from him. Here it the forecast, please chime in with your comments and thoughts I would really appreciate it;
1) I will have the entire Ascending Aorta removed
2) I will have to have a hemiarch (under circulatory arrest)
3) I will have the root remodeled (but the coronaries will remain in tact) no button
4) We will go with a EDWARDS BOVINE valve
Let's go over this a little. As per Rachel's last post the entire Ascending must be removed, mood point next, Apparently in Dr RAISSI's experience to make certain that the Aneursym does not re-occur a Hemi-arch MUST BE DONE (clamping the Aortic ARCH is not acceptable at 1-2 inches because the potential for Aneurysm is great). I like the idea of having the ROOT remodeled and not having to reimplant the coronaries (any idea if this is better), sounds better to me.
The last part is the valve selection, I was hoping to go with a Tissue but from what I have read 7-12 years would be the max it would last esp at my age. But I was as you may have read concerned about taking the Coumadin and the other issues regarding the mechanical, well he made it real simple, he suggested that BICUSPIDS (like me) usually with tissue disorder (like me, now I understand thank you Bob) do not do very well on Coumadin long term for many reasons. Also my blood type is 0- and very thin (he said that is also quite common is Bicuspids. We discussed the Porcein vs Bovine and he almost uses Bovine Edwards exclusively, sighting that 96% of patients will get 20 years out of this valve (exactly what I wanted to hear). Actually I went in thinking that if I could get him the committ to 15 years it may very well be worth going with the tissue vs the mechanical for just a few years difference and freedom from the changes. He gave me more than that I feel that if I am able to last 15-20 with this valve then I will be about 55 when I need the next (and hopefully final) valve replacement and at that time he said most should be done by cath, so the real fear of having to do another OPS is greatly reduced.
A few others on this site have voiced similar points and one individual from Texas (sorry I forgot your logon, but I will find it and post you directly) is about to make the same decision.
Please respond with your feedback to this post with thoughts and opinions. I have not finalized officially but we are looking at a surgical date of the 6/7. I feel pretty good now, first time since starting with the surgeons.
Thank you