G
Guest
An attorney has contacted me about working on a trial where a man is being forced out of his job two years before his retirement date because he is taking warfarin. If the employer is successful, he will get no pension.
The National Library of Medicine has over 35,000 journals from the last 40 years abstracted and on line. There are over 12,000,000 entries available.
I queried for all articles containing warfarin and gunshot and got back 1 (count 'em on your fingers - ONE) reference.
So I queried for warfarin and hemorrhage and death and got back ZERO (absolutely none) references.
So I queried warfarin and bleeding and death and got back ZERO (another goose egg) references.
This means that NOBODY in the past 40 years has reported in a medical journal even one case of a person taking warfarin being shot and bleeding to death.
Then I asked for reports of doctors overestimating the dangers of warfarin in the last 10 years. I got 27 references, plus some were referring to articles published prior to the past 10 years.
There are a few scattered reports of people bleeding to death from causes other than gunshot wounds but they are so rare that this seems to be an almost insignificant risk when you consider how many millions of people take warfarin.
The current trend in medicine is to based your decisions on evidence, that is published studies and reports. Since there seems to only a minimum of reports this must mean that doctors warning people about bleeding to death are either making up stories - or repeating old urban legends.
I need ammunition to totally destroy the opposition's expert witnesses. If you would like to help, put the warnings that your doctors have given you on this thread. I will not use your name but I would like to have the attorney ask the opposition's expert witness whether or not each story is backed up by a reference in the medical literature.
By the time we get done I hope that we have given so much rope that other "expert's" feet are twisting slowly in the wind.
The National Library of Medicine has over 35,000 journals from the last 40 years abstracted and on line. There are over 12,000,000 entries available.
I queried for all articles containing warfarin and gunshot and got back 1 (count 'em on your fingers - ONE) reference.
So I queried for warfarin and hemorrhage and death and got back ZERO (absolutely none) references.
So I queried warfarin and bleeding and death and got back ZERO (another goose egg) references.
This means that NOBODY in the past 40 years has reported in a medical journal even one case of a person taking warfarin being shot and bleeding to death.
Then I asked for reports of doctors overestimating the dangers of warfarin in the last 10 years. I got 27 references, plus some were referring to articles published prior to the past 10 years.
There are a few scattered reports of people bleeding to death from causes other than gunshot wounds but they are so rare that this seems to be an almost insignificant risk when you consider how many millions of people take warfarin.
The current trend in medicine is to based your decisions on evidence, that is published studies and reports. Since there seems to only a minimum of reports this must mean that doctors warning people about bleeding to death are either making up stories - or repeating old urban legends.
I need ammunition to totally destroy the opposition's expert witnesses. If you would like to help, put the warnings that your doctors have given you on this thread. I will not use your name but I would like to have the attorney ask the opposition's expert witness whether or not each story is backed up by a reference in the medical literature.
By the time we get done I hope that we have given so much rope that other "expert's" feet are twisting slowly in the wind.