I agree that multiple anonymous moderators might be a good option to either supplement or to help cover for Ross.
Again, not to critize Ross personally, but by being such an active participant on the forum, he occasionally puts himself directly in the line of fire when he has to put on his moderator hat. That's when it gets to be a pretty thankless job.
As I mentioned in my post in the earlier thread, it also can create issues with objectivity, either real or perceived. When an actively-participating moderator expresses an opinion, is it their opinion alone, or does it reflect the opinion of the "management"?
Mark