Not really a valve selection question but I was not sure where it belonged on the forums. Is a repair better than a replacement? I can see all the advantages but how about the length of time it lasts?
geebee said:Praline,
I believe a repair could last as long as some tissue valves. It will eventually require a replacement because it will continue to suffer from whatever caused the problem in the first place.
I have seen repairs last years and some last only a few months. I do not know why that is but I am sure you will hear from others.
My valve was unable to be repaired although a repair is what the surgeon was hoping for during my first OHS.
geebee said:Betty,
I am not sure how things work with aortic valves, only mitral and I am most familar with rheumatic mitrals. I am not sure about prolapsed mitrals because I am not sure what causes them to begin with. I do know any repair to a calcified mitral will fail eventually because it will simply re-calcify. I am sure it all depends on what caused the mitral valve failure to begin with. My surgeon told me if he could have done a repair it would not have lasted. However, he always preferred his patients to have their own valves as long as possible even if it required additional surgery.
Betty,bvdr said:Geebee, I think since both you and I have RHD we tend to reference from that viewpoint. It sounds like your surgeon and mine thought alike. By the way, was your surgeon able to preserve any of your chordae? I agree on the calcification issue. If a valve calcifies once it will do it again.
Surgery For Valvular Heart Diseasebvdr said:Praline,
This is a rather lengthy article but it has a good section on the durability of mitral valve repairs. It might have some helpful information for you.
http://www.dcmsonline.org/jax-medicine/2001journals/Oct2001/valvular.htm
Enter your email address to join: