Located an interesting monograph about a recent book that happens to align with some of my own, less scientific, observational thinking: http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/RMP/introF.html
Basically, this book, Radiation from Medical Procedures in the Pathogenesis of Cancer and Ischemic Heart Disease: Dose-Response Studies with Physicians per 100,000 Population. John W. Gofman, M.D., Ph.D. 1999. 699 pages. LCCN 99-045096. Hardcover: ISBN 0-932682-97-9. Softcover: ISBN 0-932682-98-7. Committee for Nuclear Responsibility Books, San Francisco. points researches into the role of medical radiation in the creation of disease states. It isn't suggesting that medical radiation is the sole cause of these issues, but that it is a required coagent in causing them.
Along with the marginally acknowledged role medical radiation plays in cancers, the research also approaches other issues, and most notably, shows a very high correlation between medical radiation (as a cofactor) and fatal atherosclerosis. This isn't a great mental leap for those of us who are aware of people with aortic valves destroyed by radiation treatment for non-Hodgkins lymphoma. If it can affect an immensely tough valve in this way, why would it not easily affect the cardiac arteries as well, helping to cause some of the lesions that develop into atheromas?
I haven't gotten the gumption to buy the book yet (700 pages: dry, tough read), but its conclusions make sense to me.
Best wishes,
Basically, this book, Radiation from Medical Procedures in the Pathogenesis of Cancer and Ischemic Heart Disease: Dose-Response Studies with Physicians per 100,000 Population. John W. Gofman, M.D., Ph.D. 1999. 699 pages. LCCN 99-045096. Hardcover: ISBN 0-932682-97-9. Softcover: ISBN 0-932682-98-7. Committee for Nuclear Responsibility Books, San Francisco. points researches into the role of medical radiation in the creation of disease states. It isn't suggesting that medical radiation is the sole cause of these issues, but that it is a required coagent in causing them.
Along with the marginally acknowledged role medical radiation plays in cancers, the research also approaches other issues, and most notably, shows a very high correlation between medical radiation (as a cofactor) and fatal atherosclerosis. This isn't a great mental leap for those of us who are aware of people with aortic valves destroyed by radiation treatment for non-Hodgkins lymphoma. If it can affect an immensely tough valve in this way, why would it not easily affect the cardiac arteries as well, helping to cause some of the lesions that develop into atheromas?
I haven't gotten the gumption to buy the book yet (700 pages: dry, tough read), but its conclusions make sense to me.
Best wishes,