Hi, Jim
Hi, Jim
...and welcome to the VR.com family.
You'll find a wide variety of opinions here from people who've had the surgery and those of us who are awaiting same.
The Cleveland Clinic is consistently ranked as the best heart hospital in the country, and there's a lot of information on their web site. Here's one of their pages that will be a good introduction for you:
http://www.clevelandclinic.org/heartcenter/pub/history/future/valve.asp
Just a couple of thoughts from my POV:
I suspect that your surgeon might mention options to you that your cardiologist has not. These would include the brand/type of mechanical valve he might want to implant, and the option of putting in a bioprosthetic valve rather than a mechanical valve.
Another option for some people is the "Ross Procedure," where the surgeon removes the diseased aortic valve, replaces it with the patient's own pulmonary valve, and implants a human donor valve in the now vacant pulmonary position. There are a lot of variables with this surgery, including the original reason for the aortic valve disease, and whether or not the native pulmonary valve is itself healthy enough to do the work for which the aortic valve was originally designed. I've done a fair amount of research on the Ross, and it's generally not done for a patient over 45-50 years of age, max.
Many people on here have much more direct experience with valve replacement surgery than I, and speak from experience. I've been asymptomatic until recently, and will hopefully have surgery in mid-November. I've learned a great deal from those on here who have gone before me. I'm sure you'll find the same to be true for you.