csutherland
Well-known member
Jerry picked up the hard copy of his Imaging Report yesterday. I could use some help from any of you who are medically astute.
Not a whole lot was made of the aneurysm. If anything, it is about 1 mm smaller than before. Then it goes on to say: "There are a few subcentimeter right paratracheal lymph nodes. Subcarinal nodal calcifications are present. There are 1.0 cm left and subcentimeter right hilar lymph nodes. No significant pericardial or pleural effusion is demonstrated. Examination of the lung windows reveals a few areas of dependent and peripheral atelectasis."
I understand the part about no pericardial effusion. I've determined via searching the web that "atelectasis" is small areas of collapsed lung, usually not serious. It's the part about the lymph nodes has me puzzled. It seems that 1.0 cm is somewhat larger than normal. I just don't understand why the lymph nodes were even mentioned. All previous tests have focused only on the arteries.
He has had prostate cancer, squamous cell carcinoma on his nose, and was diagnosed in 2001 with Mycosis Fungoides, a cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. That diagnosis was later put into some question, as the skin lesions have cleared up.
So, am I borrowing trouble?
Not a whole lot was made of the aneurysm. If anything, it is about 1 mm smaller than before. Then it goes on to say: "There are a few subcentimeter right paratracheal lymph nodes. Subcarinal nodal calcifications are present. There are 1.0 cm left and subcentimeter right hilar lymph nodes. No significant pericardial or pleural effusion is demonstrated. Examination of the lung windows reveals a few areas of dependent and peripheral atelectasis."
I understand the part about no pericardial effusion. I've determined via searching the web that "atelectasis" is small areas of collapsed lung, usually not serious. It's the part about the lymph nodes has me puzzled. It seems that 1.0 cm is somewhat larger than normal. I just don't understand why the lymph nodes were even mentioned. All previous tests have focused only on the arteries.
He has had prostate cancer, squamous cell carcinoma on his nose, and was diagnosed in 2001 with Mycosis Fungoides, a cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. That diagnosis was later put into some question, as the skin lesions have cleared up.
So, am I borrowing trouble?