G
Guest
Hello, MY wife is 71 and in good health otherwise. She had Aortic valve AVR 15 years ago, and now needs it again . They used a human valve then , and it has calcified. They are giving her the option of a new procedure called TAVR -Transcatheter aortic valve replacement . However they say and research shows this valve insert only last s5 years at most.. OR full blown lengthy open heart surgery, to actually replace the valve and deal with calcification. She is borderline high risk due to her age, but otherwise in good health. It does not make sense they would suggest the TAVR... And does make sense as to why they would not consider minimally invasive surgery and use a pig valve ? Anyone else in the same situation?