Chris P
New member
Hi, I am 49 years old. I was born with a malformed Aortic valve, basically it was too small. The murmur was caught at birth and I was enrolled in a monitoring program at Dartmouth Hitchcock. The Aorta itself was fine. By the time I was 11 the lower than normal ejection fraction caught up to me and I was not able to do much and it was decided to perform procedure to increase the amount of oxygenated blood flow coming out of the valve.
They did not replace the valve, they made incisions in it the leaflets to keep the valve open longer, basically it does not close at all. They indicated I would need a surgery again when I was 21 and most likely every 10 years. 38 years later and no second surgery. The advice back then was no physical activity of any kind really, I ignored that…. cause I was 11 J I worked construction with my dad till 30 years old, I work in an office now, lifted weights ran anything I wanted really. At the last appointment in Dartmouth at age 21 they said “we don’t want to know what you’re doing but keep on doing it”.
The valve has another 3-5 years at the rate of calcification of the incisions, but the aorta has ballooned up well past 5mm. I need to have a the valve and the aorta replaced up the U-turn. I am having a struggle with choosing a flesh or mechanical.
If I choose a mechanical valve and monitor/regulate my Coumadin can I still participate in light weight lifting and running. Reading through this great forum and other materials the result seems to be all over the place. I have been trying to make rhyme or reason to the outcomes. Basically I am trying to predict how I will react to Coumadin by looking at others history and trying to find a pattern. Or is it truly just random genetics that some people have a small effect and some a large?
Thank you for any insight you can provide
They did not replace the valve, they made incisions in it the leaflets to keep the valve open longer, basically it does not close at all. They indicated I would need a surgery again when I was 21 and most likely every 10 years. 38 years later and no second surgery. The advice back then was no physical activity of any kind really, I ignored that…. cause I was 11 J I worked construction with my dad till 30 years old, I work in an office now, lifted weights ran anything I wanted really. At the last appointment in Dartmouth at age 21 they said “we don’t want to know what you’re doing but keep on doing it”.
The valve has another 3-5 years at the rate of calcification of the incisions, but the aorta has ballooned up well past 5mm. I need to have a the valve and the aorta replaced up the U-turn. I am having a struggle with choosing a flesh or mechanical.
If I choose a mechanical valve and monitor/regulate my Coumadin can I still participate in light weight lifting and running. Reading through this great forum and other materials the result seems to be all over the place. I have been trying to make rhyme or reason to the outcomes. Basically I am trying to predict how I will react to Coumadin by looking at others history and trying to find a pattern. Or is it truly just random genetics that some people have a small effect and some a large?
Thank you for any insight you can provide