I'm somewhat baffled (what else is new?) about the effects of NAD and a precursor, NMN, on platelets.
NAD and NMN are supposed to be useful for reducing or reversing some of the effects of aging. I've been taking one or the other for about two weeks - I originally looked for any research that talked about its effects on coagulation. One of the things that I saw was that it didn't act like an NSAID (like aspirin or ibuprofen), so it was an alternative to the NSAIDS, inhibits COX2 (which is associated with pain), and is an effective alternative to NSAIDs.
I've done further research, MedPub and other studies, and the results seem to be somewhat conflicting with each other.
My INR before I started NAD+ was 2.7. Without a change in dosage, my INR this morning was STILL 2.7.
I sliced the top of my left foot last week with a piece of corn chip (don't ask), and it bled like crazy - the cut may have been deeper than I thought, I may have cut through a large vein, but I was finally able to stop the bleeding using a pad and significant pressure. The amount of bleeding was disturbing (and a bit scary).
This morning, I banged the top of my hand against my headboard - it formed a 'bump' where I had probably broken some capillaries - but aside from being purple and slightly raised, the blood hasn't diffused (so it clotted). I made an incision in a finger to take my INR - 2.7 - and it closed quickly.
Have YOU used NAD+ or NMN? Do you know about the effect of NAD+ or NMN on platelet aggregation? As I said, some of the papers seemed contradictory. And, as I mentioned, one paper suggested it as an alternative to NSAIDs because it DOESN'T affect platelets.
But my cut foot - and the hassle I had in getting it to clot - are somewhat disturbing to me.
The NAD+ and NMN seem like they're having a positive effect, a friend who is also taking it has reported a great deal of improvement, but I'm still a bit concerned because I'm taking warfarin.
Any thoughts (especially from VitDoc and Nobog and other professionals) would be appreciated.
NAD and NMN are supposed to be useful for reducing or reversing some of the effects of aging. I've been taking one or the other for about two weeks - I originally looked for any research that talked about its effects on coagulation. One of the things that I saw was that it didn't act like an NSAID (like aspirin or ibuprofen), so it was an alternative to the NSAIDS, inhibits COX2 (which is associated with pain), and is an effective alternative to NSAIDs.
I've done further research, MedPub and other studies, and the results seem to be somewhat conflicting with each other.
My INR before I started NAD+ was 2.7. Without a change in dosage, my INR this morning was STILL 2.7.
I sliced the top of my left foot last week with a piece of corn chip (don't ask), and it bled like crazy - the cut may have been deeper than I thought, I may have cut through a large vein, but I was finally able to stop the bleeding using a pad and significant pressure. The amount of bleeding was disturbing (and a bit scary).
This morning, I banged the top of my hand against my headboard - it formed a 'bump' where I had probably broken some capillaries - but aside from being purple and slightly raised, the blood hasn't diffused (so it clotted). I made an incision in a finger to take my INR - 2.7 - and it closed quickly.
Have YOU used NAD+ or NMN? Do you know about the effect of NAD+ or NMN on platelet aggregation? As I said, some of the papers seemed contradictory. And, as I mentioned, one paper suggested it as an alternative to NSAIDs because it DOESN'T affect platelets.
But my cut foot - and the hassle I had in getting it to clot - are somewhat disturbing to me.
The NAD+ and NMN seem like they're having a positive effect, a friend who is also taking it has reported a great deal of improvement, but I'm still a bit concerned because I'm taking warfarin.
Any thoughts (especially from VitDoc and Nobog and other professionals) would be appreciated.