A
Abbanabba
Well, the results are in and as I expected, there are a few things that are raising questions in my head? if no-one else?s.
Since 2002 my pulmonary regurgitation has gone from "mod-severe" to "severe" and my aortic root has dilated from 3.7cm to 4.0cm. All the other valves have trivial regurg (which is pretty normal) and the tricuspid regurg is trivial-mild, so that?s OK.
My Holter was a little alarming, with up to 241 supraventricular arrhythmias an hour, although this is in the upper heart chambers and even at that rate is not considered too much of an issue (..I?m guessing this is a fancy term for PAC?s..).
More concerning, however, were up to 274 ventricular arrhythmias an hour (PVC?s (??)), which are in the lower chamber and are often a precursor to v-tach. I also recorded:
up to 46 couplets an hour
11 monomorphic triplets
185 polymorphic couplets
65 runs of ventricular bigeminy ? longest: 15 cycles (every 2nd beat is irregular)
68 runs of ventricular trigeminy ? longest: 7 cycles (every 3rd beat is irregular)
Frequent polymorphic ventricular ectopics recorded.
122 atrial couplets
4 atrial triplets
Ventricular tachyarrhythmias are faster than 100 beats per minute by definition.
Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia would appear on an ECG record with a regular rate and rhythm and fixed shape or morphology of the ECG trace. Each beat of the tachycardia would look the same, hence the designation monomorphic.
Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia typically is irregular in rate and rhythm and has varying shapes or morphologies on the ECG. A problem that starts as a monomorphic ventricular tachycardia may deteriorate into polymorphic ventricular tachycardia.
My feelings of SOB and dizziness from climbing stairs, etc, corresponds to sinus tachycardia recorded ? which at least that confirms I?m not going crazy and it?s not just ?all in my head? ? so how they can keep telling me my symptoms aren?t a result of my heart just baffles me!
The other thing that I?m unclear about is that arrhythmias are the heart beating abnormally fast, yet my HR tends to run fairly low (usually around 60bpm with drops below 50bpm), so is my ?normal? HR actually lower than 60bpm and being ?boosted? by the arrhythmias, or what??! I?m not too sure how that works. I know my doctors are reluctant to put me on beta-blockers to address this problem because my underlying HR is already quite low and that could cause further problems.
My exercise test showed my O2 levels dropping to the mid 80?s after 7 minutes. That might be ?normal?, but stage 2 of this test was always pretty much my regular walking pace anyway ? it?s the incline that kills me. Once I got to stage 3 (at 9 minutes) I went down hill almost immediately and had to stop. I know this is within ?normal? parameters, but it was only a fast walk, which is what I find distressing since that sort of pace never used to bother me that much. Anyway, everything else seemed "OK". The only other thing was part of the ECG being ?uninterpretable due to abnormality in baseline?, yet they claim no significant changes in the conclusion (..I remember the techs checking to see if something had come loose as the readout was so erratic..).
I don?t know enough about the lung function test to draw any conclusions, only enough to surmise that the asthma medication they tried made no significant difference.
Overall, it seems (from my own research) that a lot of these things aren?t too much of an issue on their own (..although at what point does severe regurgitation become severe enough to warrant some attention..)?. but it?s the fact that together, all these things seem a little more ominous. It also ticks me off no end that they keep telling me my heart?s not the cause of my symptoms, when clearly there?s sufficient evidence to prove otherwise. It may be that surgery won?t fix these problems, but don?t tell me it?s all my imagination. PUH-LEEEZE!!!!
So that's about it. Sorry to waffle for so long, but I know you guys don?t really mind...
Cheers
Anna : )
Since 2002 my pulmonary regurgitation has gone from "mod-severe" to "severe" and my aortic root has dilated from 3.7cm to 4.0cm. All the other valves have trivial regurg (which is pretty normal) and the tricuspid regurg is trivial-mild, so that?s OK.
My Holter was a little alarming, with up to 241 supraventricular arrhythmias an hour, although this is in the upper heart chambers and even at that rate is not considered too much of an issue (..I?m guessing this is a fancy term for PAC?s..).
More concerning, however, were up to 274 ventricular arrhythmias an hour (PVC?s (??)), which are in the lower chamber and are often a precursor to v-tach. I also recorded:
up to 46 couplets an hour
11 monomorphic triplets
185 polymorphic couplets
65 runs of ventricular bigeminy ? longest: 15 cycles (every 2nd beat is irregular)
68 runs of ventricular trigeminy ? longest: 7 cycles (every 3rd beat is irregular)
Frequent polymorphic ventricular ectopics recorded.
122 atrial couplets
4 atrial triplets
Ventricular tachyarrhythmias are faster than 100 beats per minute by definition.
Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia would appear on an ECG record with a regular rate and rhythm and fixed shape or morphology of the ECG trace. Each beat of the tachycardia would look the same, hence the designation monomorphic.
Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia typically is irregular in rate and rhythm and has varying shapes or morphologies on the ECG. A problem that starts as a monomorphic ventricular tachycardia may deteriorate into polymorphic ventricular tachycardia.
My feelings of SOB and dizziness from climbing stairs, etc, corresponds to sinus tachycardia recorded ? which at least that confirms I?m not going crazy and it?s not just ?all in my head? ? so how they can keep telling me my symptoms aren?t a result of my heart just baffles me!
The other thing that I?m unclear about is that arrhythmias are the heart beating abnormally fast, yet my HR tends to run fairly low (usually around 60bpm with drops below 50bpm), so is my ?normal? HR actually lower than 60bpm and being ?boosted? by the arrhythmias, or what??! I?m not too sure how that works. I know my doctors are reluctant to put me on beta-blockers to address this problem because my underlying HR is already quite low and that could cause further problems.
My exercise test showed my O2 levels dropping to the mid 80?s after 7 minutes. That might be ?normal?, but stage 2 of this test was always pretty much my regular walking pace anyway ? it?s the incline that kills me. Once I got to stage 3 (at 9 minutes) I went down hill almost immediately and had to stop. I know this is within ?normal? parameters, but it was only a fast walk, which is what I find distressing since that sort of pace never used to bother me that much. Anyway, everything else seemed "OK". The only other thing was part of the ECG being ?uninterpretable due to abnormality in baseline?, yet they claim no significant changes in the conclusion (..I remember the techs checking to see if something had come loose as the readout was so erratic..).
I don?t know enough about the lung function test to draw any conclusions, only enough to surmise that the asthma medication they tried made no significant difference.
Overall, it seems (from my own research) that a lot of these things aren?t too much of an issue on their own (..although at what point does severe regurgitation become severe enough to warrant some attention..)?. but it?s the fact that together, all these things seem a little more ominous. It also ticks me off no end that they keep telling me my heart?s not the cause of my symptoms, when clearly there?s sufficient evidence to prove otherwise. It may be that surgery won?t fix these problems, but don?t tell me it?s all my imagination. PUH-LEEEZE!!!!
So that's about it. Sorry to waffle for so long, but I know you guys don?t really mind...
Cheers
Anna : )