D
DanHill
Hi! My name is Daniel. I'm 34 years old, and just had a valve replacement surgery done at the VA hospital in Miami.(I've been out of the hospital for 3 days now.) My condition was a regurgitating bicuspid aortic valve, a birth defect that until now was undetected. I just wanted to let everyone in this forum know how much I struggled with the two valve options, and what my decision was. I opted finally (at the last second, practically) for the natural valve. Everything I had researched on Coumadin was disturbing, and I did a LOT of research in the 7 months before my surgery. As far as I could see, the only benefit to a mechanical valve was no second surgery, but I finally felt that the drawbacks to taking this medication far outweighed the one advantage. How ironic would it be if I got the mechanical valve, only to have my life shortened anyway by getting into a serious accident and bleeding to death, hitting my head and hemmorraging, etc... My surgeons said that I could expect a good 12 to 15 years out of my natural valve, and quite possibly never need to have it replaced at all. My surgeons initially made a good case for the mechanical valve, but, after speaking with them, and presenting my research findings to them, concluded that the natural valve indeed had many advantages over the mechanical valve that needed to be taken into consideration. The one thing they did agree on, is that if I did have a second surgery, it would be more complicated, and recovery would be longer, than the first surgery. I'm willing to take that risk.