Hi , I am 35 years old and have Mitral Valve Prolapse since childhood and in 2001 had mild Mitral regurgitation. Last year my palpatations were repeating so had an echo and the Regurgitation has become moderate. Since last year i dont gain weight much and had slight dizziness and low BP often. Again last week i had severe dizziness feel and palpatations and went for an echo and diagonised with moderatly severe Regurgitation. So now my dr suggests to review again in 3months and says a repair or replacement of the mitral valve in a year is better for me. My Dr expected the surgery in about 10 years when they did the tests last year but unfortunately it has progressed so quickly in a year now and iam very upset about it. Now wats the advantage of a repair in comparison to a replacement?
It is a proven fact that a successfull mitral valve repair is preferable over a replacement. Many studies confirm this. There are many advantages, but probably the most noticeable is that, with a repair, you will (usually) not need lifelong anticoagulation therapy (that is a must with a mechanical replacement). Taking coumadin for life is not a big deal, as many experts here can confirm. But not needing it is of course better.
Nowadays, almost all prolapsing mitral valves can be successfully repaired. For isolated posterior leaflet prolapse, for instance, successfull repair rate is close to 100%. When both leaflets prolapse, repair is a little more difficult, but, in expert hands, the chances of getting your valve successfully repaired are still very high (around 90% i guess).
Surgery timing is very important. That is why you MUST have your regular checkups and follow your cardiologist instructions. And, if surgery is indicated, allways have, at LEAST, another qualified and independant opinion.
Becoming upset about a health condition does not lead to anywhere. You should accept it, and try to relax. You will be ok, and live a completely normal life.