B
Barry
A brief rant, and then some advice.
Used to work in the mental health field. In mental health, the shrinks were scrupulous about informed consent with the patients when prescribing meds. They would explain in reasonable detail both the therapeutic effect of the drug, and the possible side effects of the drug. Only then would they prescribe.
Since going under the knife a couple of years ago I've been dealing with docs for the first time in my life. And I have scolded more than one for his complete disregard of informed consent. They just write the prescription or give you the pills and say, "take this".
Pester your doc for info on the drug, but still don't expect to get the full story. When you go to the pharmacy to pick up your prescription, speak with the pharmacist, who knows more about drugs than your doc ever will, and ask the pharmacist for the "medication insert" that came with the drug when the pharmacist bought it. The pharmacist will be a bit reluctant to give it to you, because the med inserts explain all the stuff about the drug, and all its potential side effects, to the extent that were you to read the med insert for aspirin you'd think it was some sort of deadly poison. So keep in perspective what you read in a med insert. But ask for one and read it.
The Internet, of course, is also a good source of info on drugs. But the most comprehensive info is likely to be on the drug insert.
I was prescribed Amiodarone, an astonishingly toxic drug with astonishingly weird possible side-effects, without being told diddly-squat. Not even that in some folks the drug turns your skin irreversably grey-green. Now, even after I got complete info myself on Amiodarone I still gave the drug a try, discontinuing only after I failed to get any therapeutic effect from it. With any drug it's a trade-off between therapeutic effects and adverse side effects, a decision that you yourself and not your doc should make.
Some docs really should have become veterinarians.
Used to work in the mental health field. In mental health, the shrinks were scrupulous about informed consent with the patients when prescribing meds. They would explain in reasonable detail both the therapeutic effect of the drug, and the possible side effects of the drug. Only then would they prescribe.
Since going under the knife a couple of years ago I've been dealing with docs for the first time in my life. And I have scolded more than one for his complete disregard of informed consent. They just write the prescription or give you the pills and say, "take this".
Pester your doc for info on the drug, but still don't expect to get the full story. When you go to the pharmacy to pick up your prescription, speak with the pharmacist, who knows more about drugs than your doc ever will, and ask the pharmacist for the "medication insert" that came with the drug when the pharmacist bought it. The pharmacist will be a bit reluctant to give it to you, because the med inserts explain all the stuff about the drug, and all its potential side effects, to the extent that were you to read the med insert for aspirin you'd think it was some sort of deadly poison. So keep in perspective what you read in a med insert. But ask for one and read it.
The Internet, of course, is also a good source of info on drugs. But the most comprehensive info is likely to be on the drug insert.
I was prescribed Amiodarone, an astonishingly toxic drug with astonishingly weird possible side-effects, without being told diddly-squat. Not even that in some folks the drug turns your skin irreversably grey-green. Now, even after I got complete info myself on Amiodarone I still gave the drug a try, discontinuing only after I failed to get any therapeutic effect from it. With any drug it's a trade-off between therapeutic effects and adverse side effects, a decision that you yourself and not your doc should make.
Some docs really should have become veterinarians.