K
KimC
Hi,
As some of you may remember, I was diagnosed with a type of angina due to cardiac failure last February and entered into a NHLB study on female small vessel disease. I started taking an ACE and diuretic and began feeling fewer instances of chest pain, hoping that this meant I was improving.
A recent cath and echo revealed otherwise, and that in fact the RV is mildy dilated and dysfunctional. The news came as a shock. All along we've been watching for LV dilation from the aortic valve disease.
My EF is 50%; the LV is 2.4. So in terms of left-sided size and function, everything's within normal limits. The right side is a different story. From what I've been told, the RV is sensitive and unable to handle a lot of overload without damage.
I'm not a doctor, neither are many of you reading this, but I just don't get it. My pulmo said my lungs only show mild disease, and delegates all the analysis of my diagnosis to my cardiologist.
My primary cardio, Dr. Pepine is on vaca this week, so I've been discussing my test results with my local cardio who isn't as educated about small vessel disease as Pepine but is highly competent.
I -- and again, I'm NOT a doctor -- think the stress on the right side COULD be due to pulmonary arterial narrowing, or PH. This is, afterall, small vessel disease which I have been diagnosed with.
For those of you who are familiar with PH, wouldn't it show up in my PF tests? I know a right heart cath is the gold standard for diagnosing PH, and I could be headed in that direction. When is a right-heart cath is indicated? What kind of questions should I be armed with next week when I speak to Dr. Pepine?
Thanks in advance.
Best,
As some of you may remember, I was diagnosed with a type of angina due to cardiac failure last February and entered into a NHLB study on female small vessel disease. I started taking an ACE and diuretic and began feeling fewer instances of chest pain, hoping that this meant I was improving.
A recent cath and echo revealed otherwise, and that in fact the RV is mildy dilated and dysfunctional. The news came as a shock. All along we've been watching for LV dilation from the aortic valve disease.
My EF is 50%; the LV is 2.4. So in terms of left-sided size and function, everything's within normal limits. The right side is a different story. From what I've been told, the RV is sensitive and unable to handle a lot of overload without damage.
I'm not a doctor, neither are many of you reading this, but I just don't get it. My pulmo said my lungs only show mild disease, and delegates all the analysis of my diagnosis to my cardiologist.
My primary cardio, Dr. Pepine is on vaca this week, so I've been discussing my test results with my local cardio who isn't as educated about small vessel disease as Pepine but is highly competent.
I -- and again, I'm NOT a doctor -- think the stress on the right side COULD be due to pulmonary arterial narrowing, or PH. This is, afterall, small vessel disease which I have been diagnosed with.
For those of you who are familiar with PH, wouldn't it show up in my PF tests? I know a right heart cath is the gold standard for diagnosing PH, and I could be headed in that direction. When is a right-heart cath is indicated? What kind of questions should I be armed with next week when I speak to Dr. Pepine?
Thanks in advance.
Best,