Hi
wow ... talk about dig up a zombie thread ...
dixitworld;n885031 said:
I am posting on this thread after long time of inactivity
so, is the "the research" you were mentioning in your earlier post? You just found these posts in this thread?
Interestingly this thread (from 2009) has posts from 2 of the most respectable (IMO) posters this forum has. Al Capshaw and Ross. They are both highly informed and educated people who research with veracity that which was written with veracity.
So lets start with the first one potsted by DDT77 above
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/article-abstract/562897
written in 1964 I'm not even sure that any of the materials it discusses would be in manufacture today, its nothing more than a historical vignette in todays analysis. I'm sure that (like all manufacturing) the findings and results of stuff done nearly 50 years ago would long ago have been woven into the iterative cycle of development which occurs (study Toyota for instance).
Next the more recent article which is filled with words that I had to look up
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1442-2034.2002.00147.x
its dated from 2008, so as a historian its only ten years out of date, and again I'd venture that in the intervening 10 years that incident was studied ad nauseam ... publications tend to be written about the exceptions worthy of study (not the general issues, unless one is writing on how they've discovered how to fix them) The article says:
The cause of non-anastomotic graft aneurysms is most likely due to a basic structural failure in the graft, as a result of defects in fabrication, Dacron fibre deterioration or a combination of both
so its conjectural at that point, and I'd suspect a batch issue or a manufacture issue ... uncommon. It goes on to simply discuss repair options.
you say:
, but would like to know what is the observation of all members on durability of graft. I am 32 and Cardiologist of Cleveland clinic said to me after this surgery i should be lucky to live an more days after 20 years
without knowing anything more about your health situation that sort of statement is an indicator that the guy is an arrogant AR5EHOLE. I can understand
dick0236 being told that his (at that time relatively untested experimental) valve may not last his life (although he's recently had his 51st anniversary ON THAT EXACT VALVE), but not anyone modern saying stuff like that.
I propose that dickhead has put the willies up you and to be frank I'd see someone else.
Its true we just don't know how long we get ... heck I know people who died of cancer in their 30's who if interviewed in their 20's wouldn't have expected that in their futures, so unknowns are always there. But to attempt to be GodLike and predict that I'd really want to know what else is wrong with you to give him such certainty (and even then it would be statistical).
So bottom line (in my vew) is ... you're probably going to be just fine.
Best Wishes