How Coumadin Works

Valve Replacement Forums

Help Support Valve Replacement Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
D

DrAllan

Before you castigate your physician regarding Coumadin management, please be aware of the multiple factor involved.

I am a physician and test myself every three days. I have marked fluctuations in my INR. True, I choose to alter my drug dosage rather than try to maintain a rigid diet and exercise routine.

Let me address a statement I have seen on this site that it takes three days to see an effect from Coumadin. This is only partially true. The effect of Coumadin is within hours of taking the drug such that the liver produces less of the clotting factors affected by the drug. It actually takes three days to see a decrease in the levels of circulating prothrombin that are present at the exact moment that you put the pill into your mouth. It is this lag between change in production and the natural decrease in clotting factors already present that makes management difficult.

The above explanation only accounts for trying to manage the elevated INR. The reverse of trying to increase the INR is even more frustrating.


Thus, if you are trying to increase the INR, i.e. reduce the amount of active coagulating products in the blood, then the net effect is the amount of decrease in production coagulant factors combined with the natural decrease of these same factors. The time course as later explained is markedly different. Likewise if you are trying to decrease the INR if it is to high depends on increasing the natural production of clotting factors in excess of there removal by the body.

Now for another confusing factor. You must have a grasp of the concept of ?half life?. This is the time that it takes for one half of the material under study to be removed by the body. For various drugs and natural products such as clotting factors, there is a percentage of concentration below which they are not effective. This concentration varies for each of the clotting factors involved in the clotting mechanism. The half-life of each of the factors is different as is the half-life of both Coumadin and vitamin k. Consider that there are x clotting factors involved in the prothrombin cycle () and you begin to see the difficulty in predicting response.

Finally there are a multitude of other factors related to the functioning of the liver where these factors are made. Alcohol is preferentially handled by the liver at the expense of directing attention to making clotting factors. Exercise increase blood flow to the muscles at the expense of the liver and creates metabolic breakdown products that must be metabolized by the liver and divert the cells from making clotting factors. Other drugs also preferentially occupy liver cells.

There are probably multiple other factors that I have not touched upon here that affect your INR. Pleas don?t blame a conscientious MD from not keeping you balanced.

Just some other facts. Traditionally INR tests are usually drawn in the AM to allow lab testing and the ability to convey the info to the doctor so that you may be advised of any needed changes in dosage for that evening. If you took your Rx in the AM then it would be the next day before you would effect a change.

I have taken the opportunity to copy some info from the web. Truthfully, as many times as I have read it, I can?t keep the various steps straight in my mind. Needless to say, the clotting mechanism and attempts to carefully interfere with it are very complex.

http://users.rcn.com/jkimball.ma.ultranet/BiologyPages/C/Clotting.html
Initiating the Clotting Process
? Damaged cells display a surface protein called tissue factor (TF)
? Tissue factor binds to activated Factor 7.
? The TF-7 heterodimer is a protease with two substrates:
_ Factor 10 and
_ Factor 9
_ Let's follow Factor 10 first.
? Factor 10 binds and activates Factor 5. This heterodimer is called prothrombinase because it is a protease that converts prothrombin (also known as Factor II) to thrombin.
? Thrombin has several different activities. Two of them are:
_ proteolytic cleavage of fibrinogen (aka "Factor I") to form:
_ soluble molecules of fibrin and a collection of small
_ fibrinopeptides
_ activation of Factor 13 which forms covalent bonds between the soluble fibrin molecules converting them into an insoluble meshwork ? the clot.
(Thrombin and activated Factors 10 ("Xa") and 11 ("XIa") are serine proteases.

Amplifying the Clotting Process
The clotting process also has several positive feedback loops which quickly magnify a tiny initial event into what may well be a lifesaving plug to stop bleeding.
? The TF-7 complex (which started the process) also activates Factor 9.
_ Factor 9 binds to Factor 8, a protein that circulates in the blood stabilized by another protein, von Willebrand Factor (vWF).
_ This complex activates more Factor 10.
? As thrombin is generated, it activates more
_ Factor 5
_ Factor 8, and
_ Factor 11 (all shown above with green arrows).
? Factor 11 amplifies the production of activated Factor 9.
Thus what may have begun as a tiny, localized event rapidly expands into a cascade of activity.
Protein C

With its many clotting promoting activities, it is probably no accident that thrombin sits at the center of the control mechanism.
? Excess thrombin binds to cell-surface receptors called thrombomodulin.
? The resulting complex activates a plasma protein called Protein C and its cofactor Protein S.
? Together these inhibit further thrombin formation
_ directly ? by inactivating Factor 5 and
_ indirectly ? by inactivating Factor 8.
Some inherited disorders that predispose to spontaneous clots, especially in the leg veins:
? inherited deficiency of Protein C or Protein S;
? inherited mutation in the Factor 5 gene producing a protein that no longer responds to the inhibitory effect of Protein C.

Recombinant Protein C is now available to treat people threatened with inappropriate clotting, e.g., as a result of widespread infection (sepsis).

Vitamin K
Vitamin K is a cofactor needed for the synthesis (in the liver) of
? factors 2 (prothrombin), 7, 9, and 10
? proteins C and S
So a deficiency of Vitamin K predisposes to bleeding.

Conversely, blocking the action of vitamin K helps to prevent inappropriate clotting.

Warfarin (aka coumadin) is sometimes prescribed as a "blood thinner" because it is an effective vitamin K antagonist. (Warfarin is also used as a rat poison because it can cause lethal (internal) bleeding when eaten.)
 
Thank you.

We castigate some of our physicians because they are not up to speed on Coumadin themselves. If you heard some of the horror stories we here from new people coming in, it's very evident. Since you test yourself, it's given you a reason to understand how the drug works, but for most of the other physicians, it's a complete mystery and they pass on some really bad information from days of old.
 
The most difficult problem in regulating Joe's Coumadin BY FAR, is the frequent changes in his vast list of medications. He is unusual, but there are others on this site who have difficult medical conditions too, requiring frequent med changes.

The balancing act is extreme and frustrating.

There are many times when a Hospital pharmacist ihas been called upon to be right there with the cardiologist when he recommends adjustments to anything. They are very helpful not only for the selection of medications, but the spacing of them to minimize interractions, or the decision to include them at all, for fear that they would actually do more harm than good.
 
My personal physician told me that his malpractice insurance is now recommending that physicians not try to manage warfarin but send people to clinics like mine. You are right, Dr. A. there is a huge body of knowledge about warfarin. The drug has been on the market for over 50 years and there is still about one article per day being written about it.
 
Taking issues!

Taking issues!

"There are probably multiple other factors that I have not touched upon here that affect your INR. Pleas don?t blame a conscientious MD from not keeping you balanced."

I have personally seen very few people "blame a conscientious MD ". What I have seen in my long history of ACT is UNCONSCIONABLE drs. who were either ignorant about ACT or just didn't care about their pts.

While you are testing, did you do two test in a row to see if they were the
same? I have and 15 minuute apart, I have observed as much as .6 INR
difference.
My experience indicates:
Two different labs- two different outcomes.
The same lab, the same blood, the same machine- the results of
two test, same blood- two different results.

ACT testing has come a long way since the '60s, but it still could be a lot better!
 
Dr. A, for me, one of the most frustrating things I read regarding Coumadin mismanagement is when a patient tests too high, changes are made in dosage, and then the patient is tested again the next day, and more changes are made. This happens much more than it should and in my opinion, is due to a gross misunderstanding of how warfarin acts. We often read these stories and their progression over weeks of time as the member struggles to get regulated. The doctors that do this classify that patient as "hard to stabilize", and continue to make continual changes trying to get the patient in range. When the truth actually is that the lack of understanding on the part of the managing doctor (or often nurses selected by the doctor) is quite often the root cause.

The other thing that makes me go :eek: :mad: is when we read of a member who gets a 5.0 reading, takes 6 or 7 mg a day, and the doctor tells them to hold for 2 days. 99% of the time, the member then comes on to report an INR of less than 2, and quite often around 1.5. They then struggle for weeks to get that INR up into therapeutic range. But for some reason, many doctors feel more comfortable with an INR below range for a length of time, than above range.

I'm really glad you've joined us. You lend insight and knowledge. I also think you will begin to see the patterns of mismanagement and lack of knowledge on the part of the medical community that we see if you monitor this forum for a length of time. I'm sure there are more doctors that can manage warfarin successfully than there are those that don't know a whit. It's the "One Bad Apple" theory.
 
RCB

Yes, I have done some sequential testing. This has mainly been when there was a large change compared to a previous test several days before and when I did not suspect any diet responsibility. As it turns out the fluctuations were from drug therapy, mainly amiodarone and prednisone. I have also done some random sequential tests and never varied by more than 0.2 seconds with my CoaguChek. My background as a medical researcher before becoming a surgeon involved laboratory testing of samples in the range of 1/1000 (thousandth) of the size of that used in home INR monitoring. There are definite styles of technique that contribute to reproducible accuracy.

I'm off to the hospital for some drug adjustments. When I return in a few days i might comment on the physiology of septicemia and the rational for antibiotic prophylaxis
 
No problem. I have several other things I can castigate my doctors for if warfarin is taken off the list :D

I personally have made some of the statements that you refer to. For me the frustration was the inconsistency in the end-to-end treatment package that I received as a dual-mechanical replacement recipient. The surgical procedure and materials are all based in cutting-edge, high-tech advancements, and the outcome would have been deemed a miracle only a few short years ago. Then, out I go into the "real-world" to be supported by a cardiologist (former), and other professionals who speak to me about my blood being "too thick," and other indications that they may actually know less about AC therapy than I do. They may have the chemistry steps down, but from a practical standpoint they were 20 years behind. I quickly got set up with a AC team and lab that "gets it," so I consider myself lucky. Some of us are still searching.
 
INR=1.5 after 1 week back on Coumadin

INR=1.5 after 1 week back on Coumadin

OK, I had my first test today 1 week after re-starting my coumadin. It was 1.5. The cardiologist's nurse left me a message telling me Dr Stoddard wanted me to stay on my same dosing schedule (7.5 4 days a week and 5 3 days a week) and get retested in two weeks.

That seems like an awfully long time to me. I was uncomfortable enough with my not bridging, and to have to wait to more weeks to see if maybe I'm in range????

So my plan is to to back on Monday and get tested again, to see if the doc's "you're trending back up after being off for 4 days is true". I've also been on antibiotics and cough medicine for this sinus infection, and I wonder if that's having any effect on my INR rising back to therapeutic levels.
 
Carolyn, if it were me, I'd make a little bump up in my dose just for a few days and test on Monday. This "trending" upwards makes it sound slow and right now you are not in a good range. Once you get nearer to your range, then your normal dose should get you to that last wee bit of a climb. But staying on your usual dose for a 1.5 is a bit scary.
 
Following my Colonoscopy / upper Endoscopy, my Coumadin Clinic CRNP put me on an accelerated dose (not quite twice normal) for two days AND resumed Lovenox injections the night following the procedure.

Even without Bridging BEFORE your procedure, I see no reason that Lovenox couldn't be administered until your INR is back in range. WHO is administering your anti-coagulation? I'd be looking for someone who displays a better grasp than your current advisors.

'AL Capshaw'
 
I agree with Al and the accelerated dose thing too. It's a very small possibility that you'll develop a clot that fast, but it's a possibility and you know just how much I like statistics and numbers. :mad:
 
I'm taking 7.5 and retesting on Monday. This "trending up" things is a little BS'y for me. They wouldn't even consider discharging me after surgery when I was still 1.5 at CCF, so I just don't get where he thinks that waiting 2 weeks is the appropriate thing to do. He's our attending this month for Cardiology, so you can believe if I see him at work I'll take him aside and tell him how whacked his idea of managing my INR is. I wish they had an NP that did coumadin management. I would rather have someone I could talk to and get information from , vs dealing with him through the office nurse.
 
Back
Top