M
Marge
Last month had an echocardiagram -- for first time this year.
I had an echo around this time last year & my cardio also had me do a MUGA and a TEE. Last year's echo had showed an EF of 30. The MUGA showed an EF of 53 -- low normal but still normal. Big discrepancy, but, cardio advised, MUGA is more accurate, and echo is notoriously subjective, yada, yada. So I felt pretty good about that 53 EF.
BUT: now my cardio calls me to tell me this year's echo again shows an EF of 30-35!
Even given subjectivity of echos, that's two in a row with more or less same EF.
Cardio doesn't want to run any more tests now. He says maybe another MUGA next year; for one thing, he says MUGAs are very high in radiation.
About the EF he is saying that he had hoped mine would improve from the treatment (all that consists of is Cozaar for blood pressure and a beta blocker, Coreg) & so he is disappointed -- but he then says that he looks more at "trends" than at the numbers themselves. Since I am not going "down," he isn't too worried (and by extension I shouldn't be either). He said he has patients that have gone along for 10-15 years with EFs of 30 & have led perfectly satiafying lives, not going into CHF.
The good thing is that I have felt perfectly fine since my surgery -- the funny thing is that I felt perfectly fine BEFORE the surgery too! -- so I just try not too think about all this too much.
But I'd like to think my EF wasn't that low!
When I ask my cardio how to reconcile that two echos in succession say 30 while the MUGA said 53 -- are both echos that subjective? -- my cardio shrugs and says all he can say, really, is that I am "somewhere" between 30 and 53.
(Haven't yet seen full text of echo report so I don't know what else it showed.)
I had an echo around this time last year & my cardio also had me do a MUGA and a TEE. Last year's echo had showed an EF of 30. The MUGA showed an EF of 53 -- low normal but still normal. Big discrepancy, but, cardio advised, MUGA is more accurate, and echo is notoriously subjective, yada, yada. So I felt pretty good about that 53 EF.
BUT: now my cardio calls me to tell me this year's echo again shows an EF of 30-35!
Even given subjectivity of echos, that's two in a row with more or less same EF.
Cardio doesn't want to run any more tests now. He says maybe another MUGA next year; for one thing, he says MUGAs are very high in radiation.
About the EF he is saying that he had hoped mine would improve from the treatment (all that consists of is Cozaar for blood pressure and a beta blocker, Coreg) & so he is disappointed -- but he then says that he looks more at "trends" than at the numbers themselves. Since I am not going "down," he isn't too worried (and by extension I shouldn't be either). He said he has patients that have gone along for 10-15 years with EFs of 30 & have led perfectly satiafying lives, not going into CHF.
The good thing is that I have felt perfectly fine since my surgery -- the funny thing is that I felt perfectly fine BEFORE the surgery too! -- so I just try not too think about all this too much.
But I'd like to think my EF wasn't that low!
When I ask my cardio how to reconcile that two echos in succession say 30 while the MUGA said 53 -- are both echos that subjective? -- my cardio shrugs and says all he can say, really, is that I am "somewhere" between 30 and 53.
(Haven't yet seen full text of echo report so I don't know what else it showed.)