Hi!
I am followed twice a year because of moderate mitral regurgitation (originated by a mitral valve prolapse). In my last visit, my cardiologist looked at my echo, said there were no significant changes, and asked me to come back in 6 months (LV and LA are mildly enlarged). The echo report states, among other comments, that "ventricular filling is pseudonormal". My cardiologist saw this, but did not even mentionned it. Unfortunately, some weeks after, i had the bad idea to look for it in google, and it does mean "grade 2 diastolic dysfunction".
Do you know if this is something to worry about?
Is this an independant problem or is it an usual consequence of mitral regurgitation? I know these are pretty technical questions, but many of you are almost cardiologists!
Regards
I am followed twice a year because of moderate mitral regurgitation (originated by a mitral valve prolapse). In my last visit, my cardiologist looked at my echo, said there were no significant changes, and asked me to come back in 6 months (LV and LA are mildly enlarged). The echo report states, among other comments, that "ventricular filling is pseudonormal". My cardiologist saw this, but did not even mentionned it. Unfortunately, some weeks after, i had the bad idea to look for it in google, and it does mean "grade 2 diastolic dysfunction".
Do you know if this is something to worry about?
Is this an independant problem or is it an usual consequence of mitral regurgitation? I know these are pretty technical questions, but many of you are almost cardiologists!
Regards