Hi
its always a difficult choice and there is no clean cut answer.
2ndvalvereplacement;n885476 said:
...The nurses leave me confused they say my choice but seem to try sway me towards mechanical.
well to be honest, despite my respect for their work I would say that if they haven't had it themselves and be through it themselves then they really just aren't in a position to comment (except of course for their familiarity with outcomes, which they only ever see a small subset of).
You don't need to be terrified of the outcomes or the decisions, and considering you've said you have anxiety I strongly recommend you consider trying your best to take active control over that (rather than simply medications).
Considering the points you raised in your first post I think you are on the money in terms of what you are taking as key points for analysis. Myself I see that you may not have a strong understanding of "I know risks of each one lifelong Coumadin " but as you say that you may not be "good at taking" that's an important point, because every bit of research available shows that "failure to take medications is the key issue in them not being effective"
To me there is nothing wrong with the choice of a tissue valve given your present situation. I've had 3 OHS already and so ahead of you. I had my third at 42, meaning you do have room for another operation yet (in my view). So I don't see a compelling case to have a mechanical.
I'm a data driven guy and while there are wonderful magical Kool-aid claims of the newer model tissue valves, I'd say that there is no evidence (based on the analysis of claims vs reality) to support that any "increase" in durability would be more than a margin (something like 15 to 30% increase and only in rare situations (like you being over 60) as much as 50% increase in durablity.
That would put you at 66 (at longest duration) when you'd need another operation.
Its hard to predict the future, but I'd ask you also to consider a possible future when health care systems in the US are under pressure and you may not have health care insurance that covers you for "what you may want" in a future surgery. Its not uncommon for people to have their employment circumstances change as they age. A mechanical valve would allow you yourself to have a key hand in managing your health (you know, taking those pills) while a tissue valve is a known quantity of a slowly decaying valve (and the slowly decaying health and fittness which goes with that).
No matter which valve you pick its entirely possible need for another surgery arises, in which case what you pick now will be of little consequence and will be replaced. But that a possibility not a certainty. So (risk analysis hat on) Mech gives you a possibility to avoid reoperatoin and a Tissue a certainty of a reoperation (of some nature).
As you've said, this is entirely your decision, so I'm only trying to work through ideas and scenarios, as you are the one who has to decide.
If you feel like someone to chat to, please contact me.
This blog post of mine about 4 years old now but none the less I believe its still "on the money"
http://cjeastwd.blogspot.com/2014/01/heart-valve-information-for-choices.html