Hi all,
Thanks for all your replies. I am sending them a letter to re-assess my application. I told them that at least I'm being monitored, there are people out there, which can be as much as 2-5% of the population, who have the same condition, and are not being monitored! After all, every single person is at risk of something! I think they should be reassured that I’m being monitored.
What really annoyed me is that when I was talking to the medical underwriter who made the decision, I thought that she is going to know everything about my condition (me being naive) and I said to her that I’m guessing she knows all this medical terms etc.... She told me no, I don’t know anything about the condition or medical terms!! So I asked her how she based her decision, did she referred it to a cardiologist for example... She told me no, she said that she plugs my data into a computer and it gives a score..., I’m guessing...
Anxiety - 7
Heart Valve abnormal - 10
Aorta dilated - 10
High BP Readings - 8
Total 35, greater than 25 (for example) = DECLINE - HIGH RISK PATIENT!! -
Ridiculous! I could do her job!!, that’s when she asked me to send her all the correspondence from my cardiologist etc to re-assess my application. I am sure they will decline again, as if their computer already said no, than it’s a no!, ..... I wish I could sue them for all the distress they cause by going against the professionals reassurance and basically tell me, nope, we don’t trust you are going to live long enough to pay and we don’t trust your cardiologist, or any other professional, or even the actual statistic of your condition! We got a stupid operator who choose data from a drop down menu , and a machine that generate scores, that’s whom we trust!!