M
Marge
I never heard of "coumadin necrosis" before this week, when I was referred for possible valve surgery. Because my mom was on coumadin for pulmonary embolism for years, I thought I knew all about coumadin & could handle it if I had the surgery.
Maybe not!!!!
Here's the deal: I was born with a congenital defect called an arterio-venous fistula in my left arm (it's an abnormal channel between an artery & a vein). I had two heavy-duty surgeries as a little kid to correct this. In my 20's the problem reappeared. I had been in a car accident in which I banged my arm hard against the dash or steering wheel or something. An AV fistula can be either congenital like my original one, or it can be the result of an injury--nobody knows whether the second one was a reappearance of the old defect, a result of the accident, or a combination of both.
Anyway, bottom line: blood started clotting badly in arm. Was in hospital for two weeks undergoing heparin therapy. Didn't work. Clotting continued. Gangrene developed. Excruciating pain. Whole thing was pretty awful.
Finally was sent to see Dr. Edwin Wylie, star vascular surgeon at University of California at San Francisco (top guy, dead now, but still revered as pioneer in vascular surgery). He said: "I'm really so sorry, but gangrene too far gone, must amputate the arm."
So they did.
I've lived quite well for 30 years without a left arm. (Really thought I had paid my dues in terms of major surgery--now this heart thing comes along!)
Having read about this "coumadin necrosis," it suddenly occurred to me: could the gangrene have been due to the HEPARIN???? Arrrrghhhhh!
And if so, am I at risk for a recurrence if I am on coumadin? If it is a major risk, I don't know if valve surgery is a possibility. (I have no desire to ever risk gangrene again. If you have never had it, be happy. It is incredibly painful.)
I guess I will have to tell the CV surgeon about this background.
Are there tests they do ahead of time to see if you can tolerate coumadin?
Maybe not!!!!
Here's the deal: I was born with a congenital defect called an arterio-venous fistula in my left arm (it's an abnormal channel between an artery & a vein). I had two heavy-duty surgeries as a little kid to correct this. In my 20's the problem reappeared. I had been in a car accident in which I banged my arm hard against the dash or steering wheel or something. An AV fistula can be either congenital like my original one, or it can be the result of an injury--nobody knows whether the second one was a reappearance of the old defect, a result of the accident, or a combination of both.
Anyway, bottom line: blood started clotting badly in arm. Was in hospital for two weeks undergoing heparin therapy. Didn't work. Clotting continued. Gangrene developed. Excruciating pain. Whole thing was pretty awful.
Finally was sent to see Dr. Edwin Wylie, star vascular surgeon at University of California at San Francisco (top guy, dead now, but still revered as pioneer in vascular surgery). He said: "I'm really so sorry, but gangrene too far gone, must amputate the arm."
So they did.
I've lived quite well for 30 years without a left arm. (Really thought I had paid my dues in terms of major surgery--now this heart thing comes along!)
Having read about this "coumadin necrosis," it suddenly occurred to me: could the gangrene have been due to the HEPARIN???? Arrrrghhhhh!
And if so, am I at risk for a recurrence if I am on coumadin? If it is a major risk, I don't know if valve surgery is a possibility. (I have no desire to ever risk gangrene again. If you have never had it, be happy. It is incredibly painful.)
I guess I will have to tell the CV surgeon about this background.
Are there tests they do ahead of time to see if you can tolerate coumadin?