The protocol had come out before the incident I was involved with. However, it was not very widely accepted. I think that I know about the one that you are referring to also.
I was hired by the malpractice insurance company to defend the dentist in this case. The first thing that I was told was that the jury was going to love the plaintiff because she answered all questions with, "Yes", "No", or "Because the doctor told me to". Since it was obvious that we could not win on the merits of the case, we had to resort to diversions. Sort of like wearing pajamas to court when the testimony is going to be bad. The trial was to be in a small town. The other side had professors coming in to testify against my man. Having grown up in a small town and living in a small city now, I told the attorneys how to dress for court and the keywords to say to make it look like city-slickers were coming in picking on the town's loyal dentist. The suit was dropped - I guess the plaintiff saw that she was going to lose. So far as I know, the dentist got off clean. It was my baptism into learning that lawsuits are not always decided on the facts.