G
Guest
The journal Pediatric Research will be publishing a study by C. Barnes et al showing that 17 children who have been on warfarin for about 8 years had lower spinal bone mineral density that comparable children who were not on warfarin.
I wish I could tell you exactly what this means but I do not know. Apparently they are at increased risk for fracture.
I also wish I could tell you what the treatment is. The obvious answer would be calcium. However, that has not been proven because vitamin K also has a role in bone formation. Since warfarin inhibits the function of vitamin K there may not be an effective treatment.
The authors recommend screening of children but if there is no treatment, I'm not sure what good this will do without a proven treatment.
So why did I start this thread. I guess because it is something to keep in the back of a parent's mind. Calcium might not help but it probably won't hurt. They may need to do some studies with Fosamax.
Does this apply to adults. The answer is that we do not know.
As they say on the commercials, "emerging science may be ..."
Keep it in mind but do not be worried about it.
I wish I could tell you exactly what this means but I do not know. Apparently they are at increased risk for fracture.
I also wish I could tell you what the treatment is. The obvious answer would be calcium. However, that has not been proven because vitamin K also has a role in bone formation. Since warfarin inhibits the function of vitamin K there may not be an effective treatment.
The authors recommend screening of children but if there is no treatment, I'm not sure what good this will do without a proven treatment.
So why did I start this thread. I guess because it is something to keep in the back of a parent's mind. Calcium might not help but it probably won't hurt. They may need to do some studies with Fosamax.
Does this apply to adults. The answer is that we do not know.
As they say on the commercials, "emerging science may be ..."
Keep it in mind but do not be worried about it.