To LadyBlue
To LadyBlue
My point regarding what happens after death was to illustrate the fact that anything other than organ donation seems a bit foolish.
I think organ dontation is so valuable for people with no alternative that for us to deny it to them on some false pretext of delaying the inevitable decaying -well, it seems such a waste.
Regarding the parents of the Bhuddist friend's perspective - they did well to make the decision to donate in spite of their religious doubts. It takes great deal of compassion, forward thinking, and love for humanity in general to do something like that.
More difficult for them, perhaps, than it would be for me - I'm a devotee of the modern scientific school of thought that the seat of consciousness is the brain (ok, possibly the spinal cord too!).
Perhaps that's why dead tissue has never worried me - in fact, I was somewhat relieved to learn that tissue valves are preserved tissue and we don't have to take antirejection drugs! I was more concerned about the idea of their decaying, although as I understand it calcification will take place before that happens. Hmmm, puts me to wondering whether newer ones which calcif more slowly might last long enough to "rot".