L
Landon
If anybody has any experience with or thoughts about the following situation, I would appreciate your comments:
I had an AVR in January 2002. In addition, I had an aneurysm of the non-coronary cusp of the sinus of Valsalva (in the area of the aortic root), so the doctor replaced with a graft the ascending aorta and the aneurysmal non-coronary cusp, but left intact the part of the aorta where the left and right coronary arteries emerge, putting the graft in there at a supracoronary area. Prior to the surgery, the aortic root had been measured at around 5.0 cm.
I just had a check and am told that my aortic root is measuring 4.6 cm, but the valve is doing great. My understanding is that the root normally should measure in the range of 3.5 cm and that, presumably (since there are no actual post-surgical measurements of the aortic root in the chart), after the surgery in January 2002, the root would have been normal size. The recommendation is to have another MRI in a year and see what the root is measuring.
Any thoughts?
I had an AVR in January 2002. In addition, I had an aneurysm of the non-coronary cusp of the sinus of Valsalva (in the area of the aortic root), so the doctor replaced with a graft the ascending aorta and the aneurysmal non-coronary cusp, but left intact the part of the aorta where the left and right coronary arteries emerge, putting the graft in there at a supracoronary area. Prior to the surgery, the aortic root had been measured at around 5.0 cm.
I just had a check and am told that my aortic root is measuring 4.6 cm, but the valve is doing great. My understanding is that the root normally should measure in the range of 3.5 cm and that, presumably (since there are no actual post-surgical measurements of the aortic root in the chart), after the surgery in January 2002, the root would have been normal size. The recommendation is to have another MRI in a year and see what the root is measuring.
Any thoughts?