JustinD
New member
I am 32 years old and, other than the following, relatively healthy. I have gone from having moderate aortic regurgitation 6 years ago, with an apparent tricuspid aortic valve, to now having moderate-severe aortic regurgitation with moderate mitral regurgitation with evidence of prolapse. I consider my self asymptomatic and my echos show no signs of aneurism. I am now having echos every 6 months with no change over the last 3. My cardiologist has been telling me that the mitral regurgitation is probably due to the worsening of my aortic valve and should get better once the aortic is replaced. However, I recently consulted a surgeon who tells me that the "evidence of prolapse" could mean that there is a structural issue with chordae tendineae of the mitral valve which would need "repair" at the time of surgery. He says he would need to see a TEE to know for sure and it usually isn't done until just before the surgery.
Does anyone have experience with a similar scenario, one way or the other? Anyone had both valves replaced? Anyone around my age have a valve problem that, like me, is not BAV related?
Thanks!
Justin
Does anyone have experience with a similar scenario, one way or the other? Anyone had both valves replaced? Anyone around my age have a valve problem that, like me, is not BAV related?
Thanks!
Justin