Betty (BVDR) and I have been having some fun with each other about the theoretical interchangeability of the terms AI and AR, lately.
Eventually, curiosity claimed me. I spent some time going through sites that refer to aortic insufficiency yesterday, looking to find a consensus in the resources.
One of the entanglements is that Aortic Insufficiency is frequently restated as Aortic Valve Insufficiency (the valve), versus Insufficiency of the Aorta (the blood vessel). That alone is enough to engender confusion, and is probably responsible for some of the cross-definitions.
That aside, what I found, once you remove the duplicate (i.e. word-for-word copied) definitions is that the descriptions fall into three general categories:
1) Referring to insufficiency as being fully synonymous with regurgitation
2) Referring to insufficiency as being the overall diagnosis for a host of individual problems, including AS, AR, MR, and even mitral prolapse.
3) Referring to insufficiency as a separate result of a cause or set of causes
The pattern seems to be that (1) and (2) appear with about equal frequency, and (3) less than the other two. It could be argued that (2) and (3) are quite similar, inthat the causations (e.g. AR, AS, MR) are not equated directly as actually being AI, unlike (1).
So, it's basically a standoff. The term is now used loosely throughout the echotechnology specialty, almost to the point of slang, and a strict definition is probably no longer defensible. Casual usage is the bane of accuracy.
Still, my preference would remain to keep to as strict a definition as is reasonable. It seems a shame to blur the meaning of a perfectly good word for convenience's sake. In every practical sense, medically and mechanically, AI is a result, and AR a causation for it. Even the individual meanings of the words as nonmedical terms promote the logic that insufficiency is a lack of something (blood), and regurgitation is the process of something returning from where it's supposed to be back to where it came from with an unfortunate result. Those just aren't synonymous meanings. The first is a state of being, the second is an action.
One disparate thought (I am positive that someone will correct me if I'm wrong on this): in British parlance, insufficiency is frequently used as a synonym for incompetency or failure, terms preferred in the US. Inthat the valve leaks, it is incompetent, and could thus be termed insufficient - at least, if you're British or Australian...
As such, Betty, I'll honor the use of AI and AS synonymously, and I won't try to "correct" it anymore, as even the current medical sources are split on the subject.
But I still intend to use it the right way...
Eventually, curiosity claimed me. I spent some time going through sites that refer to aortic insufficiency yesterday, looking to find a consensus in the resources.
One of the entanglements is that Aortic Insufficiency is frequently restated as Aortic Valve Insufficiency (the valve), versus Insufficiency of the Aorta (the blood vessel). That alone is enough to engender confusion, and is probably responsible for some of the cross-definitions.
That aside, what I found, once you remove the duplicate (i.e. word-for-word copied) definitions is that the descriptions fall into three general categories:
1) Referring to insufficiency as being fully synonymous with regurgitation
2) Referring to insufficiency as being the overall diagnosis for a host of individual problems, including AS, AR, MR, and even mitral prolapse.
3) Referring to insufficiency as a separate result of a cause or set of causes
The pattern seems to be that (1) and (2) appear with about equal frequency, and (3) less than the other two. It could be argued that (2) and (3) are quite similar, inthat the causations (e.g. AR, AS, MR) are not equated directly as actually being AI, unlike (1).
So, it's basically a standoff. The term is now used loosely throughout the echotechnology specialty, almost to the point of slang, and a strict definition is probably no longer defensible. Casual usage is the bane of accuracy.
Still, my preference would remain to keep to as strict a definition as is reasonable. It seems a shame to blur the meaning of a perfectly good word for convenience's sake. In every practical sense, medically and mechanically, AI is a result, and AR a causation for it. Even the individual meanings of the words as nonmedical terms promote the logic that insufficiency is a lack of something (blood), and regurgitation is the process of something returning from where it's supposed to be back to where it came from with an unfortunate result. Those just aren't synonymous meanings. The first is a state of being, the second is an action.
One disparate thought (I am positive that someone will correct me if I'm wrong on this): in British parlance, insufficiency is frequently used as a synonym for incompetency or failure, terms preferred in the US. Inthat the valve leaks, it is incompetent, and could thus be termed insufficient - at least, if you're British or Australian...
As such, Betty, I'll honor the use of AI and AS synonymously, and I won't try to "correct" it anymore, as even the current medical sources are split on the subject.
But I still intend to use it the right way...