S
Sjoerd
My aortic-heartvalve needs to be replaced. Most likely by a mechanical valve. I will leave the details out, because I would like this thread to answer one question regarding anti-coagulation. This website has been helpfull so far, but it hasn't answered this question:
When you have an accident, what is the difference if you use anti-coagulation or not.
(I would like to phrase it better, but this is as good as I can get it.)
Because you will fall sometimes. You will have smaller and/or bigger accidents during your life. You will get hurt sometimes. And I?m 29 now. And I?m planning to stay around for a long time.
I will explain why I ask this question. My passion is motorcycles. I ride them on the road, off-road (?dual sporting?) and on the racetrack (just for fun, not races, but so-called trackdays). For next year I'm planning to start with drifting cars and riding them on the racetrack (no races, just fun). I also do some mountainbiking and I was planning to pick up horse-riding again.
How is that for a list of things you might better not do when you use anti-coagulation?
I understand that anti-coagulation doesn't cause you to bleed more quickly, but that only the bleeding lasts longer. But that doesn?t answer the question.
Let?s use some examples.
1. I've done all of the below and was not hurt in any way. What would happen when you use anti-coagulation?
- You're skiing and fall down.
- You fall from your pushbike.
- In a curve your motorcycle looses grip and you end up sliding down the road (not hitting anything)
- Your horse throws you off.
2. In the following cases the imaginary accidents cause broken bones for a person not using anti-coagulation. What are the extra risks when you are?
- Your motorcycle looses grip, then suddenly regains traction causing a so-called high-sider. It sends you flying through the air. This very likely causes broken bones.
- You get involved in a (not life-threatening) car-accident.
3.
Discussing life-threatening accidents isn?t very usefull I guess. As it would be life-threatening wether you are on anti-coagulation or not. Please correct me if I?m wrong.
I?m a person who is in general pretty careful by nature. I always wear protective gear when I?m on the motorcycle (Which I do daily). But when doing mountainbiking and when riding a motorcycle offroad you will fall from time to time. Not necessarily often, but it happens. It?s part of the game. Then you pick up the bike or motorcycle and get back on and continue. Normally you don?t get hurt. What happens when you use anti-coagulation?
Riding a motorcycle on a racetrack sounds dangerous. But on the racetrack there are no trees and oncoming traffic. Important factors in case you go down. I don?t race, but just ride fast on the track. Still, a small slide will probably happen at one time or another. Would it be plain stupid to keep doing this when using anti-coagulation?
Let me finish by saying that I am happy it is possible to replace heart valves. Otherwise I would not have been alive today. (I have been through heart-valve operations in the past.)
When you have an accident, what is the difference if you use anti-coagulation or not.
(I would like to phrase it better, but this is as good as I can get it.)
Because you will fall sometimes. You will have smaller and/or bigger accidents during your life. You will get hurt sometimes. And I?m 29 now. And I?m planning to stay around for a long time.
I will explain why I ask this question. My passion is motorcycles. I ride them on the road, off-road (?dual sporting?) and on the racetrack (just for fun, not races, but so-called trackdays). For next year I'm planning to start with drifting cars and riding them on the racetrack (no races, just fun). I also do some mountainbiking and I was planning to pick up horse-riding again.
How is that for a list of things you might better not do when you use anti-coagulation?
I understand that anti-coagulation doesn't cause you to bleed more quickly, but that only the bleeding lasts longer. But that doesn?t answer the question.
Let?s use some examples.
1. I've done all of the below and was not hurt in any way. What would happen when you use anti-coagulation?
- You're skiing and fall down.
- You fall from your pushbike.
- In a curve your motorcycle looses grip and you end up sliding down the road (not hitting anything)
- Your horse throws you off.
2. In the following cases the imaginary accidents cause broken bones for a person not using anti-coagulation. What are the extra risks when you are?
- Your motorcycle looses grip, then suddenly regains traction causing a so-called high-sider. It sends you flying through the air. This very likely causes broken bones.
- You get involved in a (not life-threatening) car-accident.
3.
Discussing life-threatening accidents isn?t very usefull I guess. As it would be life-threatening wether you are on anti-coagulation or not. Please correct me if I?m wrong.
I?m a person who is in general pretty careful by nature. I always wear protective gear when I?m on the motorcycle (Which I do daily). But when doing mountainbiking and when riding a motorcycle offroad you will fall from time to time. Not necessarily often, but it happens. It?s part of the game. Then you pick up the bike or motorcycle and get back on and continue. Normally you don?t get hurt. What happens when you use anti-coagulation?
Riding a motorcycle on a racetrack sounds dangerous. But on the racetrack there are no trees and oncoming traffic. Important factors in case you go down. I don?t race, but just ride fast on the track. Still, a small slide will probably happen at one time or another. Would it be plain stupid to keep doing this when using anti-coagulation?
Let me finish by saying that I am happy it is possible to replace heart valves. Otherwise I would not have been alive today. (I have been through heart-valve operations in the past.)