P
Phil
I, like my attorney, are stunned by the defense verdict. We never got past the ?standard of care? issue. In essence , the jury has said that it was ok for the dentist not to further question me about ?pre-medicating? after telling her I forgot to do that, and that she has no obligation to read the full dental chart, all of two pages! If she would of read the chart, she would of seen the note that read ?RX PEN FOR MURMOR? on the top of the chart. The verdict also suggest that It was my full responsibility to not let her clean my teeth and that I should of walked out of the office.
This was a dentist that bought the practice from my former dentist of 25 years. The one and only health chart was done in 1974. My original dentist was from the ?old-school? and we were friends, he knew me and my family on a personal level and always made sure I took my pre-meds, but hardly ever charted it.
Although the new dentist testified that she gave out almost 400 new health forms when she took over in the one year period, she did not want to give them to old customers like me as to ?not to overwhelm them with paperwork?.
The other side said that although dentist are taught to practice at the highest standard, they are not legally bound by it. In fact, some jurors said they ?cannot believe how low the standard of care is? as the law is written in California.
The other side did their best to confuse the jury about everything and they were successful. The final verdict was 9 to 3 in her favor. However it did take them 4 hours to answer that first question.
So where do I go from here, the answer is?I don?t know.. The other side has continually threaten me that if they won they will sue the crap out of me to recover their cost which we suspect is over 250K of insurance co. money. They have 15 days to submit cost to the court and the judge will decide how much they are owed.
We think we have several appeal issues but if we do appeal, that remains to be seen. If the other side pushes the cost issue, then we will be certain to appeal.
As far as a complaint to the dental board, that is the one card I have left, but with the jury verdict as it was, am not sure how far it will go.
Thanks, Phil
This was a dentist that bought the practice from my former dentist of 25 years. The one and only health chart was done in 1974. My original dentist was from the ?old-school? and we were friends, he knew me and my family on a personal level and always made sure I took my pre-meds, but hardly ever charted it.
Although the new dentist testified that she gave out almost 400 new health forms when she took over in the one year period, she did not want to give them to old customers like me as to ?not to overwhelm them with paperwork?.
The other side said that although dentist are taught to practice at the highest standard, they are not legally bound by it. In fact, some jurors said they ?cannot believe how low the standard of care is? as the law is written in California.
The other side did their best to confuse the jury about everything and they were successful. The final verdict was 9 to 3 in her favor. However it did take them 4 hours to answer that first question.
So where do I go from here, the answer is?I don?t know.. The other side has continually threaten me that if they won they will sue the crap out of me to recover their cost which we suspect is over 250K of insurance co. money. They have 15 days to submit cost to the court and the judge will decide how much they are owed.
We think we have several appeal issues but if we do appeal, that remains to be seen. If the other side pushes the cost issue, then we will be certain to appeal.
As far as a complaint to the dental board, that is the one card I have left, but with the jury verdict as it was, am not sure how far it will go.
Thanks, Phil