M
Marge
My cardiologist just advised me that, based on a 24 hour Holter monitor test, I am fairly consistently in A-flutter.
He says that the flutter is pretty well controlled and that there are no "pauses." My highest heart rate, according to the monitor, was 124 BPM (that was at 9 a.m. when I was working out).
I might add that I am not conscious of any "flutter" or palpitations or racing heart-beat, etc. The possibility a flutter was picked up on an EKG, hence the decision to put me on the Holter monitor.
My cardiologist says that coumadin is the standard recommended treatment for people in this condition is coumadin -- to reduce the risk of stroke.
Basically, if I got it correctly, he said the risk of stroke for people in my age group with heart disease and A-flutter or fibrillation is 6 %. With coumadin the risk is reduced to 1-2 %. With aspirin (instead of coumadin) the risk is 3-4 %. [I think I've got those percentages right.]
I told him I really DO NOT want to be on coumadin. I was on coumadin for three months after my surgery and I was really, really glad to be off the damn stuff, for a variety of reasons. I really do feel that coumadin impacted my life way too much to want to be on it for the rest of my life.
My cardiologist said the decision was mine; he recommended, if I don't go on coumadin, to take aspirin; which I have no problem with.
I realized when I first was diagnosed with a mitral valve problem and was getting ready to have surgery that there was a possibility that I might have to be on coumadin for the rest of my life (either if I had to have a replacement & chose a mechanical valve, or if I went into atrial fibrillation) and I was OK with that (I had to be OK with that considering the situation).
But I was very relieved when I was able to have a repair, and was told by my surgeon I only had to do three months of coumadin.And I was REALLY relieved when I was able to go off coumadin. I did not enjoy those three months. The lab visits -- it became increasingly difficult for the lab personnel to even find veins they could stick -- the need to keep monitoring & changing the dosage, the attention to diet -- all drove me up the wall. An additional issue is that we like to travel -- and not just for a week or two, and not just to places where labs are easy to find. So I would really like to stay off the damn thing, if I can.
For the moment, I have told my cardio I will go the aspirin route.
I would welcome any input on this issue. Am I being crazy?
I know that most of you who are on coumadin are on it because they have to be -- because you have mechanical valves. Is there anybody out there who's taking it just because of atrial flutter???
The difference in stroke risk really doesn't seem to me to be all that high, to put myself on the coumadin regime for the rest of my life.
He says that the flutter is pretty well controlled and that there are no "pauses." My highest heart rate, according to the monitor, was 124 BPM (that was at 9 a.m. when I was working out).
I might add that I am not conscious of any "flutter" or palpitations or racing heart-beat, etc. The possibility a flutter was picked up on an EKG, hence the decision to put me on the Holter monitor.
My cardiologist says that coumadin is the standard recommended treatment for people in this condition is coumadin -- to reduce the risk of stroke.
Basically, if I got it correctly, he said the risk of stroke for people in my age group with heart disease and A-flutter or fibrillation is 6 %. With coumadin the risk is reduced to 1-2 %. With aspirin (instead of coumadin) the risk is 3-4 %. [I think I've got those percentages right.]
I told him I really DO NOT want to be on coumadin. I was on coumadin for three months after my surgery and I was really, really glad to be off the damn stuff, for a variety of reasons. I really do feel that coumadin impacted my life way too much to want to be on it for the rest of my life.
My cardiologist said the decision was mine; he recommended, if I don't go on coumadin, to take aspirin; which I have no problem with.
I realized when I first was diagnosed with a mitral valve problem and was getting ready to have surgery that there was a possibility that I might have to be on coumadin for the rest of my life (either if I had to have a replacement & chose a mechanical valve, or if I went into atrial fibrillation) and I was OK with that (I had to be OK with that considering the situation).
But I was very relieved when I was able to have a repair, and was told by my surgeon I only had to do three months of coumadin.And I was REALLY relieved when I was able to go off coumadin. I did not enjoy those three months. The lab visits -- it became increasingly difficult for the lab personnel to even find veins they could stick -- the need to keep monitoring & changing the dosage, the attention to diet -- all drove me up the wall. An additional issue is that we like to travel -- and not just for a week or two, and not just to places where labs are easy to find. So I would really like to stay off the damn thing, if I can.
For the moment, I have told my cardio I will go the aspirin route.
I would welcome any input on this issue. Am I being crazy?
I know that most of you who are on coumadin are on it because they have to be -- because you have mechanical valves. Is there anybody out there who's taking it just because of atrial flutter???
The difference in stroke risk really doesn't seem to me to be all that high, to put myself on the coumadin regime for the rest of my life.