B
bethanne
After my second opinion appointment (by the way my new doctor is so awesome...) she questioned what my aorta looked like, as my symptoms did not line up with the performance of my leaking bi-cuspid aortic valve. Well my MRI revealed a dilated ascending aorta of 4.2 cm. When she gave me the information over the phone I was not sure of the significance of the news.
and told her I thought I could live with the fatigue a while longer and would follow up in six months(she said my regurgitation was showing 2+) which gave me a false sense of security before I began to read up on the dilated aorta...
I have placed a call to her office to schedule an appointment to talk about the new news.
What I am reading is that over a 4.0 is considered an anneurysm. and surgery recomended at 4.5 when bi-cuspid aortic valve is present?
I would appreciate any information or experience y'all have with dilated aorta's...
thanks, bethanne
and told her I thought I could live with the fatigue a while longer and would follow up in six months(she said my regurgitation was showing 2+) which gave me a false sense of security before I began to read up on the dilated aorta...
I have placed a call to her office to schedule an appointment to talk about the new news.
What I am reading is that over a 4.0 is considered an anneurysm. and surgery recomended at 4.5 when bi-cuspid aortic valve is present?
I would appreciate any information or experience y'all have with dilated aorta's...
thanks, bethanne